Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Donkey Demonstratives.Barbara Abbott - 2002 - Natural Language Semantics 10 (4):285-298.
    Donkey pronouns (e.g., it in Every farmer who owns a donkey beats it) are argued to have an interpretation more similar to a demonstrative phrase (e.g., . . . beats that donkey) than to any of the other alternatives generally considered (e.g., . . . the donkey(s) he owns, . . . a donkey he owns). Like the demonstrative phrase, the pronoun is not equivalent to Evans' E-type paraphrase, nor to either the weak or the strong reading sometimes claimed for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Fermat’s last theorem proved in Hilbert arithmetic. I. From the proof by induction to the viewpoint of Hilbert arithmetic.Vasil Penchev - 2021 - Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics eJournal (Elsevier: SSRN) 13 (7):1-57.
    In a previous paper, an elementary and thoroughly arithmetical proof of Fermat’s last theorem by induction has been demonstrated if the case for “n = 3” is granted as proved only arithmetically (which is a fact a long time ago), furthermore in a way accessible to Fermat himself though without being absolutely and precisely correct. The present paper elucidates the contemporary mathematical background, from which an inductive proof of FLT can be inferred since its proof for the case for “n (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Quantifier/variable-binding.B. H. Slater - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (3):309-321.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • De-mystieylng situations.B. H. Slater - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (2):165-178.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark