Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What's in Your File Folder? Part 3: Differentiation and Integration in Logic (and Illogic).Roger E. Bissell - 2018 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 18 (2):229-307.
    In this third installment of his series on key, underappreciated ideas in Ayn Rand's epistemology, the author discusses the nature of differentiation and integration as the functional essence of consciousness and applies that insight to various cognitive and noncognitive processes of awareness, with a special emphasis on logic and illogic. He offers an extended analysis of the fallacies of “Frozen Abstraction” and “False Alternative,” as well as critiques of a long-standing Objectivist conflation of falsity and contradiction and a relatively more (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Non-Contradiction of Determinism.Roger E. Bissell - 2019 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 19 (2):259-275.
    The author provides another metaphysical argument to bolster his thesis of the logical harmony of determinism and volition. He shows how the typical mainstream and Objectivist doctrine of “libertarian” free will commits the same logical error as the Sophist attacks on the Law of Non-Contradiction—namely, an out-of-context interpretation of, respectively, the Law of Causality and the Law of Identity as being unconditional absolutes, which they are not and cannot be.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Ayn Rand and the Lost Axiom of Aristotle: A Philosophical Mystery—Solved?Roger E. Bissell - 2019 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 19 (1):47-82.
    The author explains how Rand was absolutely correct in saying that Aristotle “stated the formula” of the Law of Identity. He corrects long-standing faulty Thomist criticisms on this issue and gives due credit to thinkers such as Antonius Andreas, Leibniz, and William Hamilton. The author further contends that the gradual shift in Objectivist usage of the Law of Identity tacitly ratifies these erroneous criticisms and has actually contributed to the failure of Objectivist thinkers to develop Rand's concept theory into a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: The Dialectical Rand.Chris Matthew Sciabarra - 2017 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 17 (2):321-357.
    Sciabarra responds to critics of the second edition of his book, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical: Wendy McElroy, who reviewed the book for The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, and Shoshana Milgram and Gregory Salmieri, whose most recent criticisms appear in A Companion to Ayn Rand. Sciabarra defends both his historical and methodological theses, situating the book within a trilogy of works that define and defend “dialectical libertarianism,” which eschews utopian thinking and embraces a fully radical mode of inquiry. Sciabarra (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation