Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What Have the Historians of Quantum Physics Ever Done for Us?Massimiliano Badino - 2016 - Centaurus 58 (4):327-346.
    Once one of the main protagonists of history of science, the historiography on quantum theory has recently gone through a process of reconfiguration of methods, research questions and epistemological framework. In this paper, I review the recent developments and propose some reflections on its future evolution.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Einstein’s second-biggest blunder: the mistake in the 1936 gravitational-wave manuscript of Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen.Alexander S. Blum - 2022 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 76 (6):623-632.
    In a 1936 manuscript submitted to the Physical Review, Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen famously claimed that gravitational waves do not exist. It has generally been assumed that there was a conceptual error underlying this fallacious claim. It will be shown, through a detailed study of the extant referee report, that this claim was probably only the result of a calculational error, the accidental use of a pathological coordinate transformation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The state is not abolished, it withers away: How quantum field theory became a theory of scattering.Alexander S. Blum - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 60:46-80.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Magnetrons and quantum electrodynamics: Engineering and physics in the case of tomonaga Sin-itiro.Kenji Ito - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 60:110-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark