Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Socratic method, defeasibility, and doxastic responsibility.Peter Boghossian & James Lindsay - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (3):244-253.
    There is an extensive body of philosophical, educational, and popular literature explaining Socratic pedagogy’s epistemological and educational ambitions. However, there is virtually no literature clarifying the relationship between Socratic method and doxastic responsibility. This article fills that gap in the literature by arguing that the Socratic method models many of the features of an ideally doxastically responsible agent. It ties a robust notion of doxastic responsibility to the Socratic method by showing how using defeaters to undermine participants’ knowledge claims can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Symposium on The New Significance of Learning: Imagination’s heartwork.Morwenna Griffiths, Kenneth Wain, Bob Davis & Pádraig Hogan - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (3):334-348.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Many Faces of Constructivist Discussion.Clinton Golding - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (5):467-483.
    Although constructivist discussions in the classroom are often treated as if they were all of the same kind, in this paper I argue that there are subtle but important distinctions that need to be made. An analysis of these distinctions shows that there is a continuum of different constructivist discussions. At one extreme are teacher-directed discussions where students are led to construct the ‘correct’ understanding of a pre-decided conclusion; at the other extreme are unstructured discussions where students are free to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • For Example? A Philosophical Case Study of Some Problems When Abstract Educational Theory Ignores Concrete Practice.Clinton Golding - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (2):476-490.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Critical Thinking and Constructivism: Mambo Dog Fish to the Banana Patch.Peter Boghossian - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):73-84.
    Constructivist pedagogies cannot achieve their critical thinking ambitions. Constructivism, and constructivist epistemological presuppositions, actively thwarts the critical thinking process. Using Wittgenstein's private language argument, this paper argues that corrective mechanisms—the ability to correct a student's propositions and cognitions against the background of a shared, knowable world—are indispensible to critical thinking. This paper provides concrete examples of actual constructivist practice and shows how a particular constructivist classroom exercise can be modified to incorporate critical thinking elements as detailed by the American Philosophical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Pedagogical Design : Bridging Learning Theory and Learning Analytics.S. K. Banihashem & Leah P. Macfadyen - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 47 (1):1-22.
    Which learning analytics (LA) approach might be the best choice for your teaching and learning context? Learning analytics as a field of research and application seeks to collect, analyze, report, and interpret educational data with the goal of improving teaching and learning. But hasty adoption of learning analytics tools and methods that are simply convenient, promoted or available risks allowing learning analytics to ‘drive the pedagogical bus’. In this paper, we propose that careful reflection on pedagogical design choices and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, humiliation, shame and a broken egg.Peter Boghossian - 2012 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (7):710-720.
    This article addresses and rebuts the claim that the purpose of the Socratic method is to humiliate, shame, and perplex participants. It clarifies pedagogical and exegetical confusions surrounding the Socratic method, what the Socratic method is, what its epistemological ambitions are, and how the historical Socrates likely viewed it. First, this article explains the Socratic method; second, it clarifies a misunderstanding regarding Socrates' role in intentionally perplexing his interlocutors; third, it discusses two different types of perplexity and relates these to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • ‘Being in the World’: The event of learning.Marianna Papadopoulou & Roy Birch - 2009 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):270-286.
    This paper employs an eclectic mix of paradigms in order to discuss constituting characteristics of young children's learning experiences. Drawing upon a phenomenological perspective it examines learning as a form of 'Being' and as the result of learners' engagement with the world in their own, unique, intentional manners. The learners' intentions towards their world are expressed in everyday activity and participation. A social constructivist perspective is thus employed to present learning as situated in meaningful socio-cultural contexts of the everyday, lived (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Teaching feminism: Problems of critical claims and student certainty.Richard Stopford - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (10):1203-1224.
    Learning about feminism can be a revelation for many students. However, for others, it can be a confounding, troubling experience. These difficulties return as problems for the teacher: how to help...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark