Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Physicalism, supervenience, and dependence: A reply to Botterell.Neil Campbell - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (1):163-167.
    Andrew Botterell has offered a fine response to my article, "Supervenience and Psycho-Physical Dependence". In my original article, I argued that Donald Davidson's brand of supervenience should be understood as a relation between predicates rather than properties, that this formulation captures a form of psycho-physical dependence that eludes other forms of supervenience, and that, as such, it might be useful to revisit Davidsonian supervenience as a means of expressing a plausible form of physicalism. Botterell's reply centres on offering support for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Physicalism, Supervenience, and Dependence.Neil Campbell - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (1):163-168.
    Andrew Botterell has offered a fine response to my article, "Supervenience and Psycho-Physical Dependence". In my original article, I argued that Donald Davidson's brand of supervenience should be understood as a relation between predicates rather than properties, that this formulation captures a form of psycho-physical dependence that eludes other forms of supervenience, and that, as such, it might be useful to revisit Davidsonian supervenience as a means of expressing a plausible form of physicalism. Botterell's reply centres on offering support for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation