Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): pp. 769-777.
    The article develops and justifies, on the basis of the epistemological argumentation theory, two central pieces of the theory of evaluative argumentation interpretation: 1. criteria for recognizing argument types and 2. rules for adding reasons to create ideal arguments. Ad 1: The criteria for identifying argument types are a selection of essential elements from the definitions of the respective argument types. Ad 2: After presenting the general principles for adding reasons (benevolence, authenticity, immanence, optimization), heuristics are proposed for finding missing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Commentary On Enthymemes and Fallacy Gaps: Commentary on Paglieri.Scott F. Aikin - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Don’T Worry, Be Gappy! On the Unproblematic Gappiness of Alleged Fallacies.Fabio Paglieri - unknown
    The history of fallacy theory is long, distinguished and, admittedly, checkered. I offer a bird eye view on it, with the aim of contrasting the standard conception of fallacies as attractive and universal errors that are hard to eradicate with the contemporary preoccupation with “non-fallacious fallacies”, that is, arguments that fit the bill of one of the traditional fallacies but are actually respectable enough to be used in appropriate contexts. Godden and Zenker have recently argued that reinterpreting alleged fallacies as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Critical Thinking.Sven Ove Hansson - 2019 - Theoria 85 (1):3-7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Nature of the Arguments for Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Evolution.Ralph M. Barnes, Rebecca A. Church & Samuel Draznin-Nagy - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (1-2):27-47.
    Seventy-two Internet documents promoting creationism, intelligent design, or evolution were selected for analysis. The primary goal of each of the 72 documents was to present arguments for creationism, I.D., or evolution. We first identified all arguments in these documents. Each argument was then coded in terms of both argument type and argument topic. We then provided a quantitative summary of each argument type and topic for each of the three positions. Three clear patterns were revealed by the data. First, websites (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Introduction: Theoretical and Technological Perspectives on Online Arguments.Chris Reed & Fabio Paglieri - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):131-135.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Plea for Ecological Argument Technologies.Fabio Paglieri - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):209-238.
    In spite of significant research efforts, argument technologies do not seem poised to scale up as much as most commentators would hope or even predict. In this paper, I discuss what obstacles bar the way to more widespread success of argument technologies and venture some suggestions on how to circumvent such difficulties: doing so will require a significant shift in how this research area is typically understood and practiced. I begin by exploring a much broader yet closely related question: To (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation