Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Theory of Religion and Historical Research. A Critical Realist Perspective on the Study of Religion as an Empirical Discipline.Hubert Seiwert - 2020 - Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 28 (2):207-236.
    The article discusses the connection between theory formation and historical research in the study of religion. It presupposes that the study of religion is conceived of as an empirical discipline. The empirical basis of theories is provided primarily by historical research, including research in the very recent past, that is, the present time. Research in the history of religions, therefore, is an indispensable part of the study of religion. However, in recent discussions on the methods, aims, and theoretical presuppositions of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Specter and horizon: Critique in ethnographies of North American Christianity.Rebekka King - 2018 - Critical Research on Religion 6 (1):21-27.
    With reference to two different projects examining North American Christianities, this symposium contribution explores opportunities for critique when conducting fieldwork. Drawing from observations made by E. E. Evans-Pritchard, I suggest that critique is most productive when it uses the perspective and position of one’s interlocutors as its point of departure.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Francis Stewart, Punk Rock Is My Religion—Straight Edge Punk and ‘Religious’ Identity. [REVIEW]George González - 2020 - Critical Research on Religion 8 (1):101-104.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon.Warren S. Goldstein - 2020 - Critical Research on Religion 8 (1):73-86.
    This is a response to Russell McCutcheon’s book chapter titled “On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship” in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Critical religion and critical research on religion: A response to the April 2016 editorial.Timothy Fitzgerald - 2016 - Critical Research on Religion 4 (3):307-313.
    This response takes up some of the editorial comments for further clarification and critique. My point has been that ‘politics’ is as much a modern invention as ‘religion’. We cannot understand the rhetorical function of ‘religion’ if we treat it as a stand-alone category referring to some supposed object or objects in the world. I am especially concerned here to keep in view the oscillating binary categories of which ‘religion' forms one parasitic half, and ‘politics' or ‘science' the other. This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations