Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How a Kantian can accept evolutionary metaethics.Frederick Rauscher - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):303-326.
    Contrary to widely held assumptions, an evolutionary metaethics need not be non-cognitivist. I define evolutionary metaethics as the claim that certain phenotypic traits expressing certain genes are both necessary and sufficient for explanation of all other phenotypic traits we consider morally significant. A review of the influential cognitivist Immanuel Kants metaethics shows that much of his ethical theory is independent of the anti-naturalist metaphysics of transcendental idealism which itself is incompatible with evolutionary metaethics. By matching those independent aspects to an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • A critique of R.d. Alexander's views on group selection.David Sloan Wilson - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (3):431-449.
    Group selection is increasingly being viewed as an important force in human evolution. This paper examines the views of R.D. Alexander, one of the most influential thinkers about human behavior from an evolutionary perspective, on the subject of group selection. Alexander's general conception of evolution is based on the gene-centered approach of G.C. Williams, but he has also emphasized a potential role for group selection in the evolution of individual genomes and in human evolution. Alexander's views are internally inconsistent and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Books Received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2000 - Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1):125-128.
    . Books Received. Ethics, Place & Environment: Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 125-128.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Booknotes.R. M. - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (1):403-406.
    There is a rather striking video currently used in police training. A firearms officer is caught on video shooting an armed suspect. The officer then gives his account of what happened, and there is no suggestion that he is tying to fabricate evidence. He says that he shot the suspect once; his partner says that he fired two shots. On the video we see four shots being deliberately fired. Memory, it seems, is an unreliable witness in situations of stress.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What does evolutionary biology tell us about philosophy and religion?Michael Bradie - 1994 - Zygon 29 (1):45-54.
    Considerations from evolutionary biology lead Michael Ruse, among others, to a naturalistic turn in philosophy. I assess some of the pragmatic and skeptical conclusions concerning ethics, religion, and epistemology that Ruse draws from his evolutionary naturalism. Finally, I argue that there is an essential tension between science and religion which forecloses the possibility of an ultimate reconciliation between the two as they are now understood.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Booknotes.R. M. - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):403-406.
    Of articles which are submitted for publication in Philosophy, a surprisingly large proportion are about the views of Richard Rorty. Some, indeed, we have published. They, along with pretty well all the articles we receive on Professor Rorty, are highly critical. On the perverse assumption that there must be something to be said for anyone who attracts widespread hostility, it is only right to see what can be said in favour of Rorty's latest collection of papers, entitled, Truth and Progress,.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Evolution and Ethics: Is an Evolutionary Ethics Possible?Ray E. Spier - 2004 - Global Bioethics 17 (1):9-15.
    Conventional wisdom generally seeks to support the notion that we cannot arrive at ethics by considerations of the state of the world. If we do this we are guilty of committing the ‘Naturalistic Fallacy’. This paper seeks to refute these contentions. I it I note that words are tools that humans use with the intention of promoting their survival. This ties into ethics, which are essentially a subset of the words used to promote human survival through their use in expressing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What rationality adds to animal morality.Bruce N. Waller - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):341-356.
    Philosophical tradition demands rational reflection as a condition for genuine moral acts. But the grounds for that requirement are untenable, and when the requirement is dropped morality comes into clearer view as a naturally developing phenomenon that is not confined to human beings and does not require higher-level rational reflective processes. Rational consideration of rules and duties can enhance and extend moral behavior, but rationality is not necessary for morality and (contrary to the Kantian tradition represented by Thomas Nagel) morality (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Booknotes.R. M. - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (3):381-388.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Booknotes.R. M. - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):501-506.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Booknotes.R. M. - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (1):123-127.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Booknotes.R. M. - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (2):249-254.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark