Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bringing the men back in:: Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women's work.Barbara F. Reskin - 1988 - Gender and Society 2 (1):58-81.
    To reduce sex differences in employment outcomes, we must examine them in the context of the sex-gender hierarchy. The conventional explanation for wage gap—job segregation—is incorrect because it ignores men's incentive to preserve their advantages and their ability to do so by establishing the rules that distribute rewards. The primary method through which all dominant groups maintain their hegemony is by differentiating the subordinate group and defining it as inferior and hence meriting inferior treatment. My argument implies that neither sex-integrating (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • The politics of reproductive benefits: U.s. Insurance coverage of contraceptive and infertility treatments.Madonna Harrington Meyer & Leslie King - 1997 - Gender and Society 11 (1):8-30.
    Recent changes in access to contraceptive and infertility treatments in the state of Illinois, and across the United States more generally, have heightened class cleavages in access to reproductive health care benefits in the United States. Using data gleaned from government testimonies, public documents, and telephone interviews, the authors found that poor women have broad access to contraceptive coverage but very little access to infertility treatments, while working-and middle-class women have increasingly broad coverage of infertility treatments but spare coverage of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dependence and independence: A cross-national analysis of gender inequality and gender attitudes.Emily W. Kane & Janeen Baxter - 1995 - Gender and Society 9 (2):193-215.
    The authors argue that women's dependence on men plays a key role in muting challenges to gender inequality, and they explore that argument through an analysis of gender-related attitudes in five countries. Women's dependence at both the societal and the individual levels is associated with less egalitarian gender attitudes; such dependence especially affects women's attitudes, drawing them toward men's less egalitarian views. Societal-level dependence also strengthens the impact of individual-level dependence on egalitarianism. The authors conclude that women's dependence discourages egalitarian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations