Switch to: References

Citations of:

Sentence stress and syntactic transformations

In Patrick Suppes, Julius Moravcsik & Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht. pp. 3--47 (1973)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Alternatives to the tensed S and specified subject conditions.Michael K. Brame - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):381 - 411.
    The original evidence advanced to support the Tensed S Condition (TSC) and the Specified Subject Condition (SSC) in Chomsky's Conditions on Transformations is reconsidered and viable alternatives to these constraints are provided. It is shown that TSC and SSC, in some instances, lead to a loss of linguistically significant generalization. Satisfactory alternatives can account for the relevant range of data and provide a more general account of additional data. Finally, counterevidence to Subjacency and Superiority is adduced, but explicit alternatives to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Understanding Focus: Pitch, Placement and Coherence.Julian J. Schlöder & Alex Lascarides - 2020 - Semantics and Pragmatics.
    This paper presents a novel account of focal stress and pitch contour in English dialogue. We argue that one should analyse and treat focus and pitch contour jointly, since (i) some pragmatic interpretations vary with contour (e.g., whether an utterance accepts or rejects; or whether it implicates a positive or negative answer); and (ii) there are utterances with identical prosodic focus that in the same context are infelicitous with one contour, but felicitous with another. We offer an account of two (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs.Angelika Kratzer - 2007 - The Linguistic Review 24 (2-3):93-135.
    In this article we will explore the consequences of adopting recent proposals by Chomsky, according to which the syntactic derivation proceeds in terms of phases. The notion of phase – through the associated notion of spellout – allows for an insightful theory of the fact that syntactic constituents receive default phrase stress not across the board, but as a function of yet-to-be-explicated conditions on their syntactic context. We will see that the phonological evi- dence requires us to modify somewhat the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Review. [REVIEW]Pauline Jacobson - 1987 - Linguistics and Philosophy 10 (3):389-426.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Jacobson on GKPS: A rejoinder. [REVIEW]Thomas Hukari & Robert D. Levine - 1990 - Linguistics and Philosophy 13 (3):363 - 381.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca's aphasia, an example.Mary-Louise Kean - 1977 - Cognition 5 (1):9-46.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   67 citations  
  • Sentence accent in information questions: Default and projection.Knud Lambrecht & Laura A. Michaelis - 1998 - Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (5):477-544.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • ([How/why]) does linguistics matter to philosophy?Francis Jeffry Pelletier - 1977 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):393-426.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark