Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Electrophysiological correlates of self-prioritization.Jie Sui, Xun He, Marius Golubickis, Saga L. Svensson & C. Neil Macrae - 2023 - Consciousness and Cognition 108 (C):103475.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study.Yu-Fang Yang, Eric Brunet-Gouet, Mariana Burca, Emmanuel K. Kalunga & Michel-Ange Amorim - 2020 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Literature Review of EEG-Based Affective Computing in Marketing.Guanxiong Pei & Taihao Li - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12:602843.
    Affect plays an important role in the consumer decision-making process and there is growing interest in the development of new technologies and computational approaches that can interpret and recognize the affects of consumers, with benefits for marketing described in relation to both academia and industry. From an interdisciplinary perspective, this paper aims to review past studies focused on electroencephalography (EEG)-based affective computing (AC) in marketing, which provides a promising avenue for studying the mechanisms underlying affective states and developing recognition computational (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On the Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underlying the Adaptability to Varying Cognitive Control Demands.Nicolas Zink, Ann-Kathrin Stock, Amirali Vahid & Christian Beste - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12:394520.
    Cognitive control processes are advantageous when routines would not lead to the desired outcome, but this can be ill-advised when automated behavior is advantageous. The aim of this study was to identify neural dynamics related to the ability to adapt to different cognitive control demands – a process that has been referred to as ‘metacontrol.’ A sample of N = 227 healthy subjects that was split in a ‘high’ and ‘low adaptability’ group based on the behavioral performance in a task (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark