Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What do we owe co-nationals and non-nationals? Why the liberal nationalist account fails and how we can do better.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Journal of Global Ethics 1 (2):127 – 151.
    Liberal nationalists have been trying to argue that a suitably sanitized version of nationalism - namely, one that respects and embodies liberal values - is not only morally defensible, but also of great moral value, especially on grounds liberals should find very appealing. Although there are plausible aspects to the idea and some compelling arguments are offered in defense of this position, one area still proves to be a point of considerable vulnerability for this project and that is the issue (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Global Distributive Justice, Entitlement, and Desert.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 31 (sup1):109-138.
    The facts of global poverty are staggering. Consider, for instance, how 1.5 billion people subsist below the international poverty line, which means about a quarter of the world's current population lives in poverty. There is much talk about how freer markets will help the situation of these people, in particular how it will help the worst off. So far the evidence for this claim is fairly unclear. ‘At any rate, on several accounts, alleviating the worst aspects of poverty would impose (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • What do we owe co-nationals and non-nationals? why the liberal nationalist account fails and how we can do better.Dr Gillian Brock - 2005 - Journal of Global Ethics 1 (2):127-151.
    Liberal nationalists have been trying to argue that a suitably sanitized version of nationalism—namely, one that respects and embodies liberal values—is not only morally defensible, but also of great moral value, especially on grounds liberals should find very appealing. Although there are plausible aspects to the idea and some compelling arguments are offered in defense of this position, one area still proves to be a point of considerable vulnerability for this project and that is the issue of what, according to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Justice within different borders: A review of Caney's global political theory. [REVIEW]Margaret R. Moore - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):255 – 268.
    This essay examines the central claim of Caney's book, viz., that there is no reason to treat the global sphere differently from the domestic sphere. It suggests that there is much that is valuable in having relatively autonomous, differentiated political communities, which both versions of Caney's scope argument ignore. This insight is explored via a critical assessment of both versions of Caney's scope argument; version 1, which is focused on civil and political rights (and argues that that they should be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Global egalitarianism.Chris Armstrong - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):155-171.
    To whom is egalitarian justice owed? Our fellow citizens, or all of humankind? If the latter, what form might a global brand of egalitarianism take? This paper examines some recent debates about the justification, and content, of global egalitarian justice. It provides an account of some keenly argued controversies about the scope of egalitarian justice, between those who would restrict it to the level of the state and those who would extend it more widely. It also notes the cross-cutting distinction (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Taxation and global justice: Closing the gap between theory and practice.Gillian Brock - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (2):161–184.
    I examine how reforming our international tax regime could be an important vehicle by which we can begin to realize global justice. For instance, eliminating tax havens, tax evasion, and transfer pricing schemes are all important to ensure accountability and to support democracies. I argue that the proposals concerning taxation reform are likely to be more effective in tackling global poverty than Thomas Pogge's global resources dividend because they target some of the central issues more effectively. I also discuss many (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • (1 other version)Humanitarian intervention: Closing the gap between theory and practice.Gillian Brock - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (3):277–291.
    abstract Apparently, there are some important tensions that must be confronted in grappling with the issue of the permissibility of humanitarian intervention. Notably, there is the tension between respecting sovereignty and responding to the plight of the needy, that is, there is tension between respecting governments’ authority and desire for non‐interference, and respecting the individuals who suffer under their leadership. I argue that these and other tensions should be resolved in favour of protecting the individuals who suffer in humanitarian crises, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Cosmopolitan Principles of Distributive Justice.Aysel Doğan - 2010 - Prolegomena 9 (2):243-269.
    Cosmopolitans hold that our duties of distributive justice to others do not stop at borders. Darrel Moellendorf is among those who defend the view that principles of distributive justice are applicable beyond borders. He suggests as a principle of international justice the global difference principle, which allows inequalities in the distribution of wealth and resources only if they are to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged individuals. In this paper, I try to indicate that Moellendorf’s argument for the global (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Kozmopolitanska načela distributivne pravednosti.Aysel Doğan - 2010 - Prolegomena 9 (2):243-269.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark