Switch to: References

Citations of:

Rethinking the Just War Tradition

State University of New York Press (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Nanotechnologically Enhanced Combat Systems: The Downside of Invulnerability.Robert Mark Simpson & Robert Sparrow - 2014 - In Bert Gordijn & Anthony Mark Cutter (eds.), In Pursuit of Nanoethics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 89-103.
    In this paper we examine the ethical implications of emerging Nanotechnologically Enhanced Combat Systems (or 'NECS'). Through a combination of materials innovation and biotechnology, NECS are aimed at making combatants much less vulnerable to munitions that pose a lethal threat to soldiers protected by conventional armor. We argue that increasing technological disparities between forces armed with NECS and those without will exacerbate the ethical problems of asymmetric warfare. This will place pressure on the just war principles of jus in bello, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • From Aggression to Just Occupation? The Temporal Application of Jus Ad Bellum Principles and the Case of Iraq.Jordy Rocheleau - 2010 - Journal of Military Ethics 9 (2):123-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • From Hiroshima to Baghdad: Military Hegemony versus Just Military Preparedness.Harry van der Linden - 2010 - In Ėduard Vasilʹevich Demenchonok (ed.), Philosophy after Hiroshima. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 203-232.
    In this paper I question the morality of U.S. military supremacy or hegemony in terms of what constitute the legitimate use of military force and the proper preparation for using such force. I first discuss in a somewhat synoptic fashion how American hegemonic military force has been justified in dishonest ways and wrongly executed. Next, I show that Just War Theory needs to be revised in order to come to a convincing assessment of U.S. military hegemony and its use of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention in Libya.James Pattison - 2011 - Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):271-277.
    The moral permissibility of the intervention in Libya largely turns on two fairly tricky assessments: whether the situation was sufficiently serious at the time the intervention was launched and what the predominant purposes of the intervention were.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Would Armed Humanitarian Intervention Have Been Justified to Protect the Rohingyas?Benjamin D. King - 2020 - Journal of Military Ethics 19 (4):269-284.
    The mass killings, large-scale gang rape and large-scale expulsion of the Rohingyas from Myanmar constitute one of the most repugnant world events in recent years. This article addresses the question of whether armed humanitarian intervention would have been morally permissible to protect the Rohingyas. It approaches the question from the perspective of the jus ad bellum criteria of just war theory. This approach does not yield a definitive answer because knowing whether certain jus ad bellum conditions might have been satisfied (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation