Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (2 other versions)Challenges in the Federal Regulation of Pain Management Technologies.Lars Noah - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):55-74.
    Those who write about pain management have focused almost entirely on delivery issues, paying essentially no attention to the federal regulatory challenges that affect the development of pain relief technologies — namely, pharmaceuticals and medical devices indicated for analgesic uses. The academic literature is strangely devoid of any sophisticated discussion of the difficulties that attend, first, the product approval decisions of the Food and Drug Administration and, second, the scheduling decisions made by the Drug Enforcement Administration. If a “bottleneck” develops (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Do physicians' legal duties to patients conflict with public health values? The case of antibiotic overprescription.Carl H. Coleman - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):181-185.
    Among the many explanations for antibiotic overprescription, some doctors cite the risk of malpractice liability if they deny a patient's request for an antibiotic and the patient's condition worsens. In this paper, I examine the merits of this concern—i.e., whether physicians could, in fact, face malpractice liability for refusing to prescribe an antibiotic when, from a public health perspective, the use of the antibiotic would be considered inappropriate. I conclude that the potential for liability cannot be dismissed entirely, but the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Providing Relief to Those in Pain: A Retrospective on the Scholarship and Impact of the Mayday Project.Sandra H. Johnson - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):15-20.
    Scholarship has intrinsic value, of course; but when good scholarship can stimulate change for the better in an area as fundamental to human dignity as health care and the relief of suffering, there is a special satisfaction. This has been our experience since 1996, when the first of now four special issues of this journal focused on legal, regulatory, ethical, professional, and financial issues in medical treatment for pain.With the generous and steadfast support of the Mayday Fund, the American Society (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Providing Relief to Those in Pain: A Retrospective on the Scholarship and Impact of the Mayday Project.Sandra H. Johnson - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):15-20.
    Scholarship has intrinsic value, of course; but when good scholarship can stimulate change for the better in an area as fundamental to human dignity as health care and the relief of suffering, there is a special satisfaction. This has been our experience since 1996, when the first of now four special issues of this journal focused on legal, regulatory, ethical, professional, and financial issues in medical treatment for pain.With the generous and steadfast support of the Mayday Fund, the American Society (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Challenges in the Federal Regulation of Pain Management Technologies.Lars Noah - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):55-74.
    Those who write about pain management have focused almost entirely on delivery issues, paying essentially no attention to the federal regulatory challenges that affect the development of pain relief technologies — namely, pharmaceuticals and medical devices indicated for analgesic uses. The academic literature is strangely devoid of any sophisticated discussion of the difficulties that attend, first, the product approval decisions of the Food and Drug Administration and, second, the scheduling decisions made by the Drug Enforcement Administration. If a “bottleneck” develops (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Challenges in the Federal Regulation of Pain Management Technologies.Lars Noah - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):55-74.
    Those who write about pain management have focused almost entirely on delivery issues, paying essentially no attention to the federal regulatory challenges that affect the development of pain relief technologies — namely, pharmaceuticals and medical devices indicated for analgesic uses. The academic literature is strangely devoid of any sophisticated discussion of the difficulties that attend, first, the product approval decisions of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and, second, the scheduling decisions made by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). If a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations