Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Harm to Nonhuman Animals from AI: a Systematic Account and Framework.Simon Coghlan & Christine Parker - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (2):1-34.
    This paper provides a systematic account of how artificial intelligence (AI) technologies could harm nonhuman animals and explains why animal harms, often neglected in AI ethics, should be better recognised. After giving reasons for caring about animals and outlining the nature of animal harm, interests, and wellbeing, the paper develops a comprehensive ‘harms framework’ which draws on scientist David Fraser’s influential mapping of human activities that impact on sentient animals. The harms framework is fleshed out with examples inspired by both (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Human and Animal Well‐Being.Donald W. Bruckner - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102 (3):393-412.
    There is almost no theoretical discussion of non‐human animal well‐being in the philosophical literature on well‐being. To begin to rectify this, I develop a desire satisfaction theory of well‐being for animals. I contrast this theory with my desire theory of well‐being for humans, according to which a human benefits from satisfying desires for which she can offer reasons. I consider objections. The most important are (1) Eden Lin's claim that the correct theory of well‐being cannot vary across different welfare subjects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The role of ethical reflection and dialogue in conceptualising animal welfare.Simon Coghlan - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (3):1-17.
    This paper argues that ethical reflection and dialogue can assist in understanding what animal welfare is. Questions about animal welfare’s nature are thorny and contested. Responding to an essay by Donald Bruckner, the paper acknowledges that animal welfare is a type of normative value distinct from ethical value and that the methodology for determining prudential value is not simply reducible to ethical thought. However, it contends that connections between ethics and understanding wellbeing are closer than we might expect. The paper (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Animal welfare: science without hard problems: Marian Stamp Dawkins: The science of animal welfare: understanding what animals want. [REVIEW]Nicolas Delon - 2021 - Metascience 30 (3):463-466.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark