Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A soft gynocentric critique of the practice of modern sport.Lisa Edwards & Carwyn Jones - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (3):346 – 366.
    In this article we propose a philosophical critique of two general, but not exhaustive, approaches to gender studies in sport, namely gynocentric feminism and humanist feminism. We argue that both approaches are problematic because they fail clearly to distinguish or articulate their epistemological and ideological commitments. In particular, humanist feminists articulate the human condition using the sex/gender dichotomy, which fails to account adequately for gendered subjectivity. For them gender difference is a contingent feature of humanity developed through socialisation. As a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • “The State of the Art: Meta-Theory and New Research Methods”.A. J. Schneider, N. V. Szudy & M. M. Williams - 2014 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41 (1):79-95.
    We argue that new meta-theoretically based applications of non-traditional perspectives of knowledge in science, and sport science, that highlights the question of ‘being woman’, and our understanding of woman as a social and biological being through sport, can enrich the general understanding of gender, identity, body and sport by developing and deepening a critical humanistic sport science perspective through athletes’ artistic reflections of their own athletic female body.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark