Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Brain Death Revisited: The Case for a National Standard.Eun-Kyoung Choi, Valita Fredland, Carla Zachodni, J. Eugene Lammers, Patricia Bledsoe & Paul R. Helft - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):824-836.
    The concept of brain death evolved because advancements in medical science permitted unprecedented artificial maintenance of vital body functions by external means. Although the concept of brain death is accepted clinically, ethically, and legally in the United States, there is no national standard for the determination of brain death. There is evidence that variability and inconsistency in the process of determining brain death exist both in clinical settings and in State statutes. Several studies demonstrate that medical personnel determine brain death (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The ethics of testing and research of manufactured organs on brain-dead/recently deceased subjects.Brendan Parent, Bruce Gelb, Stephen Latham, Ariane Lewis, Laura L. Kimberly & Arthur L. Caplan - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (3):199-204.
    Over 115 000 people are waiting for life-saving organ transplants, of whom a small fraction will receive transplants and many others will die while waiting. Existing efforts to expand the number of available organs, including increasing the number of registered donors and procuring organs in uncontrolled environments, are crucial but unlikely to address the shortage in the near future and will not improve donor/recipient compatibility or organ quality. If successful, organ bioengineering can solve the shortage and improve functional outcomes. Studying (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Medicolegal Complications of Apnoea Testing for Determination of Brain Death.Ariane Lewis & David Greer - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (3):417-428.
    Recently, there have been a number of lawsuits in the United States in which families objected to performance of apnoea testing for determination of brain death. The courts reached conflicting determinations in these cases. We discuss the medicolegal complications associated with apnoea testing that are highlighted by these cases and our position that the decision to perform apnoea testing should be made by clinicians, not families, judges, or juries.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Respecting a Patient's Religious Values.Maria Sue DeWolf Bosek - 2008 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 10 (4):100-105.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation