Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Immanence in Schelling and Hegel in the Jena Period.Paolo Diego Bubbio & Daniele Fulvi - 2022 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 60 (3):353-387.
    In this article, we argue that in the Jena period (1801–1803) Schelling and Hegel both rejected the conception of God as coinciding with the moral order, which they attribute to Fichte; such coincidence, in their view, turned God into a transcendent and merely moral Being. In an effort to demonstrate their distance from Fichte's view, we contend, Schelling and Hegel advocated for a metaphysical (rather than merely moral) and immanent (rather than transcendent) understanding of God, conceived in its inextricable relation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Reality of Religion in Hegel’s Idealist Metaphysics.Paolo Diego Bubbio - 2016 - Hegel Bulletin 37 (2):232-257.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reconciliation, Incarnation, and Headless Hegelianism.Dennis Vanden Auweele - 2017 - Faith and Philosophy 34 (2):201-222.
    A number of contemporary authors (e.g., Catherine Malabou, Slavoj Žižek, and John Caputo) claim that Hegel’s Religionsphilosophie provides important insights for contemporary philosophy of religion. John Caputo argues that Hegel’s notion of incarnation as radical kenosis is a powerful tool for postmodern Radical Theology. In this essay, I scrutinize this claim by balancing Hegel’s notion of incarnation with his notion of recognition—the latter of which Caputo removes from a “headless Hegelianism.” I argue that a non-Hegelian, non-dialectic sense of recognition ought (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark