Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Darwin at Orchis Bank: Selection after the Origin.Kathryn Tabb - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 55 (C):11-20.
    Darwin’s first publication after the Origin of Species was a volume on orchids that expanded on the theory of adaptation through natural selection introduced in his opus. Here I argue that On the Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects (1862) is not merely an empirical confirmation of his theory. In response to immediate criticisms of his metaphor of natural selection, Darwin uses Orchids to present adaptation as the result of innumerable natural laws, rather than (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Alan Gross and the rhetoric of science.Randy Harris - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (3):pp. 346-380.
    This article reviews the recent work of Alan G. Gross , with prominent notice, as well, of works by Leah Ceccarelli, Celeste Condit, and Jeanne Fahnestock, among others, in order to sketch out developments in the rhetoric of science.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Deceived by orchids: sex, science, fiction and Darwin.Jim Endersby - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Science 49 (2):205-229.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation