Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Something That Used to Be Objectivism: Barbara Branden’s Psycho-Epistemology.Robert L. Campbell - 2020 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 20 (2):301-327.
    Think as If Your Life Depends on It puts Barbara Branden’s lectures on the Principles of Efficient Thinking in print at last, along with three later lectures. In Roger Bissell’s excellent transcription, the ten lectures introduce readers to psycho-epistemology, the difference between directed and undirected thinking, the role of the subconscious in problem-solving, common faults in thinking, and motivational issues that interfere with thinking. Her contributions were effectively erased from Objectivism after the Nathaniel Branden Institute closed; the original lectures were (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ayn Rand and the Lost Axiom of Aristotle: A Philosophical Mystery—Solved?Roger E. Bissell - 2019 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 19 (1):47-82.
    The author explains how Rand was absolutely correct in saying that Aristotle “stated the formula” of the Law of Identity. He corrects long-standing faulty Thomist criticisms on this issue and gives due credit to thinkers such as Antonius Andreas, Leibniz, and William Hamilton. The author further contends that the gradual shift in Objectivist usage of the Law of Identity tacitly ratifies these erroneous criticisms and has actually contributed to the failure of Objectivist thinkers to develop Rand's concept theory into a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Return of the Arbitrary: Peikoff's Trinity, Binswanger's Inferno, Unwanted Possibilities—and a Parrot for President.Robert L. Campbell - 2019 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 19 (1):83-134.
    Leonard Peikoff brought into Objectivist epistemology the doctrine that what is asserted arbitrarily cannot be true or false. In 2008 the author gave a detailed critique of the doctrine; it has not received a published response. But there have been restatements by Harry Binswanger, Ben Bayer, and Gregory Salmieri. Their re-presentations do not refute any old arguments; their new arguments make the doctrine worse. The doctrine is being used to justify ignoring known possibilities, and to “prove” that the current president (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation