Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Faith overcoming metaphysics: Gianni Vattimo and Thomas Aquinas on being.Victor Salas - 2022 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 92 (2):99-113.
    This paper considers Gianni Vattimo’s rejection of metaphysical conceptions of being in favor of a hermeneutic ontology developed along the lines of ‘weak thought.’ I argue that Vattimo’s critique neglects an abiding pluralism within the very history of metaphysical thought itself; at least some metaphysical conceptions of being in that history do not fall prey to his critique. To establish my claim I turn to Thomas Aquinas, whose metaphysics is couched within a larger theological context and presents itself dynamically, thereby (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Tomo Akviniečio empirizmas: pažinimo objekto klausimas.Marija Oniščik - 2015 - Problemos 88:66.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Martin Heidegger and Russian symbolist philosophy.Robert Bird - 1999 - Studies in East European Thought 51 (2):85-108.
    In this paper Russian Symbolist philosophy is represented primarily by Viacheslav Ivanov (1866--1949), but its conclusions are intended to be valid for other philosophers we classify as Symbolist, including Nikolai Berdiaev and S. L. Frank. It is posited that, by comparing Ivanov''s cosmology, aesthetics, and anthropology to those of Martin Heidegger, one can reconceive of Symbolist philosophy as an existential hermeneutic. This, it is claimed, can help to identify a common basis among the Symbolist philosophers, and also to place Russian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Heidegger and the Destruction of Aristotle, written by Kirkland, S.D.Eugene M. DeRobertis - 2024 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 55 (1):109-120.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Re‐thinking Truth: Assessing Heidegger's critique of Aquinas in light of Vallicella's critique of Heidegger.Jonathan Lyonhart - 2020 - New Blackfriars 103 (1105):326-336.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation