Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Care, Compassion, or Cost: Redefining the Basis of Treatment in Ethics and Law.Tom Koch - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):130-139.
    Early announcements of this special journal issue solicited authors interested in contributing articles on the subject of “costs at the end of life.” Those who replied were then informed the title was being changed, on the basis of early subscriber interest, in “rational end-of-life treatment.” Because that seemed a still inadequate reflection of the authorial concerns of responding potential contributors, the editors again changed the title, two months later, to “Making Treatments More Rational and Compassionate for the Chronically Critically Ill.” (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Limits of Proxy Decision Making: Undertreatment.Muriel R. Gillick & Terri Fried - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (2):172.
    With the passage by virtually every state legislature of healthcare proxy laws, the medical profession increasingly can expect to rely on the participation of surrogates in making decisions on behalf of incompetent patients. Several concerns about the legitimacy of proxy decision making have been discussed in the ethical and general medical literature: the lack of concordance between the views of patients and their surrogates have been documented on multiple occasions, and cases of abuse by proxies or potential conflict of interest (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Caring for the Seriously Ill: Cost and Public Policy.Thaddeus M. Pope, Robert M. Arnold & Amber E. Barnato - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):111-113.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Case of Samuel Golubchuk and the Right to Live.Alan Jotkowitz, Shimon Glick & Ari Z. Zivotofsky - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):50-53.
    Samuel Golubchuk was unwittingly at the center of a medical controversy with important ethical ramifications. Mr. Golubchuk, an 84-year-old patient whose precise neurological level of function was open to debate, was being artificially ventilated and fed by a gastrostomy tube prior to his death. According to all reports he was neither brain dead nor in a vegetative state. The physicians directly responsible for his care had requested that they be allowed to remove the patient from life support against the wishes (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations