Switch to: References

Citations of:

Complex Justice, Cultural Difference, and Political Community

In David Miller & Michael Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford University Press (1995)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Defining the medical sphere.Margo J. Trappenburg - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):416-.
    Part of the debate on cost containment in healthcare systems may be characterized as applied political philosophy One might say that the current debate between competing theories of justice that started with Rawls' A Theory of Justice in 1971 has acquired a small sister debate in healthcare philosophy Major participants in the debate on social justice have become an important source of inspiration for bioethicists interested in a just distribution of healthcare resources. Thus Rawls' A Theory of Justice has been (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reassessing Walzer’s social criticism.Marcus Agnafors - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9):917-937.
    It is often argued that Michael Walzer’s theory of social criticism, which underpins his theory of justice, is not much of a theory at all, but rather an impressionistic collection of historical anecdotes. Contrary to this perception, I argue that Walzer’s method can be accurately described as a version of John Rawls’ well-known method of wide reflective equilibrium. Through a systematic comparison it can be shown that the two methods are strikingly similar. This implies that, far from the critics’ claim, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Philosophy, Democracy and Tyranny: Michael Walzer and Political Philosophy.Alan Apperley - 2001 - The European Legacy 6 (1):7-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Equality without Documents: Political Justice and the Right to Amnesty.Michael Blake - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (S1):99-122.
    All modern democratic societies claim to be egalitarian. They do not agree, of course, about what egalitarianism demands; the ideal of equality is hardly transparent and can be plausibly understood to encompass any number of social arrangements and values. Thatsomeform of equality is to be prized, though, is uncontroversial. Indeed, it may be true that all political theories that have stood the test of time can be understood as specifying and interpreting the ideal of equality. Whether or not this is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations