Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Spatial language and spatial representation: a cross-linguistic comparison.Edward Munnich, Barbara Landau & Barbara Anne Dosher - 2001 - Cognition 81 (3):171-208.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • (1 other version)Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: Head, body, and the self-to-array axis.Adam Richardson David Waller, Yvonne Lippa - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Beyond Language Shift: Spatial Cognition among the Ixcatecs in Mexico.Evangelia Adamou & Xingjia Rachel Shen - 2017 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 17 (1-2):94-115.
    Recently there has been a renewed interest surrounding the role that language plays in the shaping of cognition based on the study of spatial relations with a particular attention to Mesoamerican languages. Since Brown and Levinson, several studies have shown that speakers of Mesoamerican languages largely prefer non-egocentric strategies in the solution of nonverbal tasks and that this preference strongly aligns to the spatial expressions found in these languages. Moreover, it has been argued that contact with Spanish increases the use (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Spatial language and spatial representation.William G. Hayward & Michael J. Tarr - 1995 - Cognition 55 (1):39-84.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Object Orientation Affects Spatial Language Comprehension.Michele Burigo & Simona Sacchi - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (8):1471-1492.
    Typical spatial descriptions, such as “The car is in front of the house,” describe the position of a located object (LO; e.g., the car) in space relative to a reference object (RO) whose location is known (e.g., the house). The orientation of the RO affects spatial language comprehension via the reference frame selection process. However, the effects of the LO's orientation on spatial language have not received great attention. This study explores whether the pure geometric information of the LO (e.g., (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (1 other version)Isolating observer-based reference directions in human spatial memory: Head, body, and the self-to-array axis.David Waller, Yvonne Lippa & Adam Richardson - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):157-183.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Cued by What We See and Hear: Spatial Reference Frame Use in Language.Kenny R. Coventry, Elena Andonova, Thora Tenbrink, Harmen B. Gudde & Paul E. Engelhardt - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:353401.
    To what extent is the choice of what to say driven by seemingly irrelevant cues in the visual world being described? Among such cues, how does prior description affect how we process spatial scenes? When people describe where objects are located their use of spatial language is often associated with a choice of reference frame. Two experiments employing between-participants designs ( N = 490) examined the effects of visual cueing and previous description on reference frame choice as reflected in spatial (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Mechanisms of Reference Frame Selection in Spatial Term Use: Computational and Empirical Studies.Holger Schultheis & Laura A. Carlson - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (2):276-325.
    Previous studies have shown that multiple reference frames are available and compete for selection during the use of spatial terms such as “above.” However, the mechanisms that underlie the selection process are poorly understood. In the current paper we present two experiments and a comparison of three computational models of selection to shed further light on the nature of reference frame selection. The three models are drawn from different areas of human cognition, and we assess whether they may be applied (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Elevation as a Grammatical and Semantic Category of Demonstratives.Diana Forker - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Positional priming of visual pop-out search is supported by multiple spatial reference frames.Ahu Gokce, Hermann J. Müller & Thomas Geyer - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Inter-process relations in spatial language: Feedback and graded compatibility.Holger Schultheis & Laura A. Carlson - 2018 - Cognition 176 (C):140-158.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes.Andrew Surtees, Ian Apperly & Dana Samson - 2013 - Cognition 129 (2):426-438.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • What is Special About Body Based Reference Frame?Neha Khetrapal - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (2-3):221-227.
    Classifying spatial frames of references have placed egocentric/body-based representations on muddy grounds. The traditional taxonomy places it under the deictic distinction while the Levinson’s terminology does not provide a special status for it but classifies it along with the relative frame of reference. Research from other areas of cognition has come up with other implied classifications that are motivated by the special role played by these egocentric representation(s). Tangled among such issues is the fuzzy distinction between egocentric and body based (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The intrinsic frame of reference and the Dhivehi ‘FIBO’ system.Jonathon Lum - 2021 - Cognitive Linguistics 32 (4):703-737.
    While geocentric and relative frames of reference have figured prominently in the literature on spatial language and cognition, the intrinsic frame of reference has received less attention, though various subtypes of the intrinsic frame have been proposed. This paper presents a revised classification of the intrinsic frame, distinguishing between three subtypes: a ‘direct’ subtype, an ‘object-centered’ subtype and a ‘figure-anchored’ subtype, with a cross-cutting distinction between ‘function-based’ and ‘shape-based’ systems. In addition, the ‘FIBO’ system in Dhivehi is analyzed as an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Does direction matter? Linguistic asymmetries reflected in visual attention.Thomas Kluth, Michele Burigo, Holger Schultheis & Pia Knoeferle - 2019 - Cognition 185 (C):91-120.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Action, verbal response and spatial reasoning.R. FRanceswang - 2004 - Cognition 94 (2):185-192.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations