Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Sophistik, Performanz, Performativ.Barbara Cassin - 2022 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 70 (1):1-36.
    The present paper discusses the characteristics of performative speech through three distinct but related episodes: 1. the ancient origins of “convincing speech“ in Homeric and Sophistic discourse; 2. the treatment of linguistic issues through speech by South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission; 3. present-day language as determined and constituted by the plurality of languages, between the Scylla and Charybdis of “Globish” and “ontological nationalism”. John L. Austin’s theory of performative speech acts as laid down in How to do Things With (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Interpretação Aristotélica do Pensamento Protagoreano em MetafísicaΓ4-6.Anderson Borges - 2017 - Journal of Ancient Philosophy 11 (2):82-105.
    In Metaphysics Γ 4-6 Aristotle argues that Protagoras is committed not just to denying the PNC, but also to asserting its contrary. In this paper, I offer an analysis of this commitment. I try to show that Aristotle is working with a specific idea in mind: a Protagoreanism ontologically linked to the flux doctrine, as Plato suggested in Theaetetus 152-160.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Aristotle on Non-contradiction.Paula Gottlieb - 2023 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Colloquium 4.Michael Pakaluk - 1993 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 9 (1):157-166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pyrrhonism and the Law of Non-Contradiction.Diego E. Machuca - 2011 - In D. E. Machuca (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Springer.
    The question of whether the Pyrrhonist adheres to certain logical principles, criteria of justification, and inference rules is of central importance for the study of Pyrrhonism. Its significance lies in that, whereas the Pyrrhonist describes his philosophical stance and argues against the Dogmatists by means of what may be considered a rational discourse, adherence to any such principles, criteria, and rules does not seem compatible with the radical character of his skepticism. Hence, if the Pyrrhonist does endorse them, one must (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A não-contradição é a medida de todas as coisas: sobre a crítica de Aristóteles a Protágoras no Livro Γ da Metafísica.Pedro Clemente Bessa Prado Lippmann - 2009 - Codex 1 (2):27-50.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark