Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attained.Federico Cerutti, Massimiliano Giacomin & Mauro Vallati - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 276 (C):1-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Abstract solvers for Dung’s argumentation frameworks.Remi Brochenin, Thomas Linsbichler, Marco Maratea, Johannes P. Wallner & Stefan Woltran - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (1):41-72.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games: 25 years later.Pietro Baroni, Francesca Toni & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (1-2):1-14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning.Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 254 (C):1-20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Structural constraints for dynamic operators in abstract argumentation.Johannes P. Wallner - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (1-2):151-190.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: Results and analysis.Matthias Thimm & Serena Villata - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence 252 (C):267-294.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • On the responsibility for undecisiveness in preferred and stable labellings in abstract argumentation.Claudia Schulz & Francesca Toni - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 262 (C):301-335.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving.Thomas Linsbichler, Marco Maratea, Andreas Niskanen, Johannes P. Wallner & Stefan Woltran - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 307 (C):103697.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Towards a framework for computational persuasion with applications in behaviour change1.Anthony Hunter - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (1):15-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Design and results of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation.Sarah A. Gaggl, Thomas Linsbichler, Marco Maratea & Stefan Woltran - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 279 (C):103193.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The attack as strong negation, part I.D. Gabbay & M. Gabbay - 2015 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 23 (6):881-941.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: Beyond independence.Bettina Fazzinga, Sergio Flesca & Filippo Furfaro - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 268 (C):1-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks.Wolfgang Dvořák, Alexander Greßler, Anna Rapberger & Stefan Woltran - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence 317 (C):103873.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • RAFDivider: a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks.Sylvie Doutre & Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex - 2023 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (3-4):244-297.
    1. Argumentation, by considering arguments and their interactions, is a way of reasoning that has proven successful in many contexts, for instance, in multi-agent applications (Carrera & Iglesias,...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reasoning in abstract dialectical frameworks using quantified Boolean formulas.Martin Diller, Johannes Peter Wallner & Stefan Woltran - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (2):149-177.
    dialectical frameworks constitute a recent and powerful generalisation of Dung's argumentation frameworks, where the relationship between the arguments can be specified via Boolean formulas. Recent results have shown that this enhancement comes with the price of higher complexity compared to AFs. In fact, acceptance problems in the world of ADFs can be hard even for the third level of the polynomial hierarchy. In order to implement reasoning problems on ADFs, systems for quantified Boolean formulas thus are suitable engines to be (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations