Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Best interests determination within the Singapore context.Lalit R. K. Krishna - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (6):787-799.
    Familialism is a significant mindset within Singaporean culture. Its effects through the practice of familial determination and filial piety, which calls for a family centric approach to care determination over and above individual autonomy, affect many elements of local care provision. However, given the complex psychosocial, political and cultural elements involved, the applicability and viability of this model as well as that of a physician-led practice is increasingly open to conjecture. This article will investigate some of these concerns before proffering (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West.A. F. Mobeireek, F. Al-Kassimi, K. Al-Zahrani, A. Al-Shimemeri, S. al-Damegh, O. Al-Amoudi, S. Al-Eithan, B. Al-Ghamdi & M. Gamal-Eldin - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (4):225-229.
    Objectives: to assess physicians’ and patients’ views in Saudi Arabia towards involving the patient versus the family in the process of diagnosis disclosure and decision-making, and to compare them with views from the USA and Japan.Design: A self-completion questionnaire was translated to Arabic and validated.Participants: Physicians from different specialties and ranks and patients in a hospital or attending outpatient clinics from 6 different regions in KSA.Results: In the case of a patient with incurable cancer, 67% of doctors and 51% of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Development and validation of the ethical challenges in clinical situations-questionnaire (ECCS-Q) by involving health-care providers from a tertiary care health setting.Snehil Gupta, Swarndeep Singh, Siddharth Sarkar & Atul Batra - 2022 - Clinical Ethics 17 (2):172-183.
    Background and rationale Clinicians often encounter a variety of ethical challenges in their routine clinical practice, and it varies across healthcare and cultural settings of their practice. Despite of this, there are no clear-cut available guidelines concerning the right course of action in a given ethically challenging situation. A validated instrument that could capture the health care providers’ (HCP’s) viewpoints in this regard is lacking from Indian settings. Thus, the current study aimed at developing an instrument to assess the HCP’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark