Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why Images Cannot Be Arguments, But Moving Ones Might.Marc Champagne & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - forthcoming - Argumentation:1-30.
    Some have suggested that images can be arguments. Images can certainly bolster the acceptability of individual premises. We worry, though, that the static nature of images prevents them from ever playing a genuinely argumentative role. To show this, we call attention to a dilemma. The conclusion of a visual argument will either be explicit or implicit. If a visual argument includes its conclusion, then that conclusion must be demarcated from the premise or otherwise the argument will beg the question. If (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark