Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Data Access Committees.Jan Piasecki & Phaik Yeong Cheah - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-8.
    BackgroundSharing de-identified individual-level health research data is widely promoted and has many potential benefits. However there are also some potential harms, such as misuse of data and breach of participant confidentiality. One way to promote the benefits of sharing while ameliorating its potential harms is through the adoption of a managed access approach where data requests are channeled through a Data Access Committee (DAC), rather than making data openly available without restrictions. A DAC, whether a formal or informal group of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Opinions and attitudes of research ethics committees in Arab countries in the Middle East and North African region toward ethical issues involving biobank research.Zeinab Mohammed, Fatma Abdelgawad, Mamoun Ahram, Maha E. Ibrahim, Alya Elgamri, Ehsan Gamel, Latifa Adarmouch, Karima El Rhazi, Samar Abd ElHafeez & Henry Silverman - 2024 - Research Ethics 20 (1):1-18.
    Members of research ethics committees (RECs) face a number of ethical challenges when reviewing genomic research. These include issues regarding the content and type of consent, the return of individual research results, mechanisms of sharing specimens and health data, and appropriate community engagement efforts. This article presents the findings from a survey that sought to investigate the opinions and attitudes of REC members from four Arab countries in the Middle East and North Africa (Egypt, Morocco, Sudan, and Jordan) toward these (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark