Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Deterring Unethical Behaviors in Marketing Channels: The Role of Distributor Whistleblowing.Jing Zhou, Shibin Sheng & Chuang Zhang - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 181 (1):97-115.
    AbstractIn marketing channels, distributor whistleblowing can deter unethical behaviors, though little academic research investigates this tactic. Drawing on whistleblowing literature in business ethics and organizational theory, as well as field interviews with channel managers, this article identifies and elucidates the notion of distributor whistleblowing in marketing channels. Specifically, this study investigates how a manufacturer’s control modes (monitoring and incentives) encourage or discourage distributor whistleblowing. This study also considers the impact of distributor whistleblowing on relationship quality and the moderating effects of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Whistleblowing and the ‘Person-Situation’ Conundrum: What Matters More?Meenal Gakhar & Zubin R. Mulla - 2021 - Journal of Human Values 27 (3):247-260.
    This article extends the knowledge on whistleblowing by studying the impact of two individual antecedents and two situational factors (ethical leadership...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Is Ethical Leadership Linked to Subordinate Taking Charge? A Moderated Mediation Model of Social Exchange and Power Distance.Qiao Wang, Xiaohu Zhou, Jiani Bao, Xueyan Zhang & Wei Ju - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • If You Can’t Join ‘Em, Report ‘Em: A Model of Ostracism and Whistleblowing in Teams.Trevor M. Spoelma, Nitya Chawla & Aleksander P. J. Ellis - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 173 (2):345-363.
    Unethical behavior coordinated and concealed by teams continues to represent a troubling and all-too-frequent occurrence in organizations. Unfortunately, those who are most knowledgeable about this behavior and thereby best suited to report it to authorities—the complicit members themselves—are susceptible to unique pressures that often discourage them from blowing the whistle. Team members rely on their teammates for relational and other beneficial resources, making it more difficult to potentially break those ties by snitching. However, we argue that the pressure to stay (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A cross-level study of the relationship between ethical leadership and employee constructive deviance: Effects of moral self-efficacy and psychological safety climate.Luming Shang & Lei Yang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Constructive deviance describes acts that benefit the organization by deviating from outdated organizational norms. Despite emerging interest in this behavior, questions remain about why and how constructive deviance occurs. This paper integrates social learning and uncertainty reduction theories, and develops a multilevel model linking team-level ethical leadership to employee constructive deviance. Surveying 313 subordinates and 52 supervisors from 15 different companies in eastern China, we find that team-level ethical leadership has a positive impact on employee constructive deviance, and that both (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)‘Whistleblowing Triangle’: Framework and Empirical Evidence.Hengky Latan, Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (1):189-204.
    This work empirically tests the concept of the ‘whistleblowing triangle,’ which is modeled on the three factors encapsulated by the fraud triangle, in the Indonesian context. Anchored in the proposition of an original research framework on the whistleblowing triangle and derived hypotheses, this work aims to expand the body of knowledge on this topic by providing empirical evidence. The sample used is taken from audit firms affiliated with both the big 4 and non-big 4 companies operating in Indonesia. The results (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Prohibitive Voice as a Moral Act: The Role of Moral Identity, Leaders, and Workgroups.Salar Mesdaghinia, Debra L. Shapiro & Robert Eisenberger - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 180 (1):297-311.
    Employees’ may view prohibitive voice—that is, expressing concerns about harmful practices in the workplace—as a moral yet interpersonally risky behavior. We, thus, predict that prohibitive voice is likely to be influenced by variables associated with moral and relational qualities. Specifically, we hypothesize that employees’ moral identity internalization—i.e., the centrality of moral traits in their self-concept—is positively associated with their use of prohibitive voice. Furthermore, we hypothesize that this association is stronger when employees enjoy a higher quality relationship with their leader. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Ethical Leadership Prompts Employees’ Voice Behavior? The Roles of Employees’ Affective Commitment and Moral Disengagement.Jin Cheng, Xin Sun, Jinting Lu & Yuqing He - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    Previous literature has demonstrated that ethical leadership could predict employees’ voice behavior. However, it’s not clear how to heighten these positive effects of ethical leadership on employees’ voice behavior. Building on the AET and moral disengagement studies, we developed an integrated model. A three-wave field study investigated the relationship between ethical leadership and voice behavior by focusing on the mediating role of employees’ affective commitment and the moderating role of employees’ moral disengagement. Our matched data analysis results indicated that: employees’ (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Intention without action? Differences between whistleblowing intention and behavior on corruption and fraud.Sebastian Oelrich - 2021 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 30 (3):447-463.
    Whistleblowing is an effective tool against fraud and corruption in organizations. However, as researchers have struggled to acquire data on actual whistleblowers, research relies on hypothetical intention data and student samples, which is seen as a major limitation. Using a field study of 1,416 employees from China, Germany, and Russia, the purpose of this article is to identify differences and similarities between intention and actual whistleblowing decisions, thus aiding research and interpretation of prior and future studies. I also contribute by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations