Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Leader Humility and Machiavellianism: Investigating the Effects on Followers’ Self-Interested and Prosocial Behaviors.Shu-Chen Chen, Wen-Qian Zou & Na-Ting Liu - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Existing research on leader humility primarily demonstrates its positive effects. This study challenges this view by proposing the potential negative effects of leader humility on followers’ behaviors. Furthermore, this paper employs the person-situation interactionist perspective to extend the research on integrating followers’ personality traits and leader humility. Specifically, this study proposed that leader humility triggers their followers’ sense of power; moreover, this study wagers that whether followers’ sense of power encourages self-interested or prosocial behavior in followers depends on their particular (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • How Lack of Integrity and Tyrannical Leadership of Managers Influence Employee Improvement-Oriented Behaviors.Jean-Sébastien Boudrias, Vincent Rousseau & Denis Lajoie - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 172 (3):487-502.
    This study investigates how lack of perceived organizational integrity by managers negatively affects bottom-up improvement-oriented behaviors at lower hierarchical levels. It is expected that expressions of tyrannical leadership by the manager, a self-serving type of leadership, will mediate the relation between POI and job improvement behaviors. Further, this study investigates the role of mimicry of manager behaviors and of other supervisor’s responses to understand how manager tyrannical leadership effect is carried through to the lowest level. Our initial postulate is that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Disobeying Orders’ as Responsible Leadership: Revisiting Churchill, Percival and the Fall of Singapore.Amy L. Fraher - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 175 (2):247-263.
    In many organizations, subsidiary performance goals are developed remotely by optimistic leaders back at headquarters, leaving deployed managers vulnerable to unrealistic operational expectations on the frontline, unable to follow orders. Most management research categorizes employees’ failure to follow workplace directives as deviant behavior. In contrast, I argue that in some circumstances ‘disobeying orders’ should be considered a virtuous, responsible leadership strategy when facing unachievable tasks. Through a historical analysis of the surrender of the British colony Singapore to Japan during World (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark