Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How Capitalist Were the ‘Bourgeois Revolutions’?Charles Post - 2019 - Historical Materialism 27 (3):157-190.
    The canonical version of the ‘bourgeois revolutions’ has been under attack from both pro-capitalist ‘Revisionist’ historians and ‘Political Marxists’. Neil Davidson’s book How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions? provides a thorough review of the intellectual history of the notion of the bourgeois revolution and attempts to rescue the concept from varied criticism. Despite distancing himself from problematic formulations of the bourgeois revolution inherited from Second-International Marxism, Davidson’s own framework reproduces many of the historical and conceptual problems of this tradition.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Political Marxism and the Rules of Reproduction of Capitalism: A Historicist Critique.Samuel Knafo & Benno Teschke - 2020 - Historical Materialism 29 (3):54-83.
    Marxism has often been associated with two different legacies. The first rests on a strong exposition and critique of the logic of capitalism, grounded in a systematic analysis of the laws of motion of capitalism as a system. The second legacy refers to a strong historicist perspective grounded in a conception of social relations that emphasises the centrality of power and social conflict to the analysis of history. This article challenges the prominence of structural accounts of capitalism by showing how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • The Vacuity of Structurelessness: Situating Agency and Structure in Exploitative and Alienated Social Relations.Xavier Lafrance - 2021 - Historical Materialism 29 (3):84-106.
    Replying to Samuel Knafo and Benno Teschke, this article shows how Political Marxism offers powerful conceptual tools to understand modes of production that structure historical processes as fundamentally constituted by exploitative social and political relations. I explain how structure, or rules of reproduction, should be understood as alienated social relations, which are inherent to all class societies. Understanding structure this way leaves ample space for – and makes inevitable – the consideration of agency.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Limits of the Universal: The Promises and Pitfalls of Postcolonial Theory and Its Critique.Alexander Anievas & Kerem Nişancıoğlu - 2017 - Historical Materialism 25 (3):36-75.
    This article seeks to reassess the potential merits and weaknesses of the Subaltern Studies project through the prism of Vivek Chibber’s much-publicised and controversial bookPostcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. By critically examining Chibber’s work, the article aims to better pinpoint exactly what is ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ with the Subaltern Studies project, while drawing out some productive points of engagement between Marxism and postcolonial theory more generally. In particular, we argue that an understanding of the origins of capitalist modernity (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark