Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (2 other versions)Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know - that is not the question.Bjørn Hofmann - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):1-9.
    BackgroundAlthough the “right not to know” is well established in international regulations, it has been heavily debated. Ubiquitous results from extended exome and genome analysis have challenged the right not to know. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Recommendations urge to inform about incidental findings that pretend to be accurate and actionable. However, ample clinical cases raise the question whether these criteria are met. Many incidental findings are of uncertain significance. The eager to feedback information appears to enter the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Ethical concerns in integrating sport-related concussion (SRC) genetic testing into return-to-play (RTP) protocols.Tatiana Spitsyna & Pascal Borry - forthcoming - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:1-12.
    The occurrence of sport-related concussions (SRCs) has emerged as a significant health concern in professional sports, with millions of concussions occurring worldwide each year. Current return-to-play (RTP) protocols after SRCs involve a multi-disciplinary approach with growing interest in genetic testing technology. Numerous studies have indicated that the gene Apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) holds promise as a predictive factor for developing diseases after concussions and other traumatic brain injuries. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing and contentious debate surrounding the impact of SRC genetic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation