Switch to: References

Citations of:

Kant's Debt to Leibniz

In Graham Bird (ed.), A Companion to Kant. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 79–92 (2006)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Toward a reterritorialization of cultural theory.Marek Tamm & Kalevi Kull - 2016 - History of the Human Sciences 29 (1):75-98.
    This article argues that from a territorial perspective a certain coherence and continuity can be identified in the Estonian cultural-theoretical tradition – a discursive body based on common sources of influence and similar fundamental attitudes. We understand Estonian theory as a local episteme – a territorialized web of epistemological associations and rules for making sense of the world, which favours some premises while discouraging others. The article focuses on the older layers of Estonian theory, discussing the work of Karl Ernst (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • For a Dialectic-First Approach to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.James Kreines - 2022 - Open Philosophy 5 (1):490-509.
    To judge by the title, one would expect that interpretations of the Critique of Pure Reason would prioritize the division of the book most about reason and its critique: The Transcendental Dialectic. But the Dialectic is surprisingly secondary in the most established interpretive approaches. This article argues as follows: There is a problem that contributes to explaining the lack of popularity: The problem of how arguments really based in the Dialectic itself really promise to ground a broader project in theoretical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Kant’s Supreme Principle of Pure Reason and the Principle of Sufficient Reason.Rosalind Chaplin - forthcoming - Journal of the History of Philosophy.
    In the Transcendental Dialectic, Kant formulates a principle he calls the “supreme principle of pure reason” (hereafter, ‘SP’). According to SP, if a conditioned object is given, then the whole series of its conditions and hence something unconditioned is also given (A308/B365). Most interpreters take SP to be Kant’s rendering of the rationalist’s Principle of Sufficient Reason (hereafter, ‘PSR’), which says that everything has a sufficient reason that explains why it is the way it is. I argue that this obscures (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark