Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Are Director Equity Policies Exclusionary?Dan R. Dalton - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4):415-432.
    Abstract:This paper examines two recent trends relative to boards of directors’ compensation, and their potential incompatibility. There has been some progress in increasing board diversity, specifically the inclusion of women and minorities on boards. The increasing trend requiring directors to hold/purchase equity as a requirement of board membership may seriously compromise further improvements in diversifying boards. Also, an increasing number of companies compensate directors partially or fully in stock grants and options. These compensation policies may be exclusionary, especially for women (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Ownership Structure and Insider Trading: Evidence from China.Qing He & Oliver M. Rui - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 134 (4):553-574.
    In this paper, we examine the information content of insider transactions in China and analyze how ownership structures shape market reaction to these transactions. We find that the cumulative abnormal return to insider purchases is a convex function of the percentage of shares owned by the largest shareholder. Further, the CAR to insider purchases is lower when the largest shareholder is government-related, or when the control rights of the largest shareholder exceed its cash flow rights. We also find that the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Initial Public Offerings as a Web of Conflicts of Interest: An Empirical Assessment.Catherine M. Daily - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (3):289-314.
    Abstract:While a ubiquitous phenomenon, initial public offerings (IPOs) have received no attention in the ethics literature. We provide an overview of a series of potential conflicts of interest that pervade the IPO process. We also report the results of an empirical assessment of IPOs and those elements that may inform a substantive moral hazard faced by key players in the period prior to and just after an IPO.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Director Stock Compensation: An Invitation to a Conspicuous Conflict of Interests?Catherine M. Daily - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):89-108.
    Abstract:While many aspects of stock and option based compensation for corporate officers remain controversial, we suggest that the growing trend for similar practices in favor of boards of directors will prove to be even more contentious. High-ranking corporate managers do not set their own salaries nor authorize their own stock options. By contrast, boards of directors do, in fact, set their own compensation packages. Other potential conflicts of interest include setting option performance targets, stock buybacks, stock option resets and reloads, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations