Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How many bare demonstratives are there in English?Christopher Gauker - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (4):291-314.
    In order to capture our intuitions about the logical consistency of sentences and the logical validity of arguments, a semantics for a natural language has to allow for the fact that different occurrences of a single bare demonstrative, such as “this”, may refer to different objects. But it is not obvious how to formulate a semantic theory in order to achieve this result. This paper first criticizes several proposals: that we should formulate our semantics as a semantics for tokens, not (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • (6 other versions)Quaderns de filosofia VI, 2.Quad Fia - 2019 - Quaderns de Filosofia 6 (2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Semàntica i pragmàtica, contingut i context.Joan Gimeno-Simó - 2019 - Quaderns de Filosofia 6 (2):91.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Moving parts: a new indexical treatment of context-shifting predication.Daniel Giberman - 2016 - Synthese 193 (1):95-124.
    A context-shifting example involves a putatively non-ambiguous, non-elliptical, non-indexical declarative sentence, some distinct utterances of which differ in truth value despite sameness of place, time, surrounding objects, and other physical factors. Charles Travis has spawned a large literature by arguing that such examples undermine compositional truth-conditional semantics. After explaining how prior responses to Travis’s examples fail in the metaphysical details, the present essay develops a new approach that treats a wide range of subject terms as disguised indexicals sensitive to mereological (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations