Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Philosophy of Education in the Public Sphere: The Case of “Relevance”.Christopher Martin - 2011 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (6):615-629.
    Universities are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the economic and social relevance of the research they produce. In the UK, for example, recent developments in the UK under the Research Excellence Framework (REF) suggest that future funding schemes will grant “significant additional recognition…where researchers build on excellent research to deliver demonstrable benefits to the economy, society, public policy, culture and quality of life” (HEFCE 2009 ). Having conceded that this and similar developments are likely to continue into the future, this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Education as interaction.Martin Wenham - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 25 (2):235–246.
    ABSTRACT The teaching-learning process is of central importance in education. By developing a concept of effective teaching and a corresponding model of the teaching-learning process, it is argued that unless the needs of pupils are to be disregarded, teachers must become co-learners and responsibility for quality of education must be shared. Education is seen as an interactive process in which teachers and pupils participate co-operatively. It is shown that this concept, already implicit in much educational thought and practice, can contribute (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Education(al) Research, Educational Policy-Making and Practice.Charles Clark - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (1):37-57.
    Professor Whitty has endorsed the consensus that research into education is empirical social science, distinguishing ‘educational research’ which seeks directly to influence practice, and ‘education research’ that has substantive value but no necessary practical application.The status of the science here is problematic. The positivist approach is incoherent and so supports neither option. Critical educational science is virtually policy-inert. The interpretive approach is empirically sound but, because of the value component in education, does not support education research either, or account for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations