Switch to: References

Citations of:

What changes are there in decisions by the Wits Human Research Ethics Committee and in process errors by research applicants between 2003 and 2015? [Book Review]

Peter Cleaton-Jones

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 9 (2):66-68 (2016)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

What are the most common reasons for return of ethics submissions? An audit of an Australian health service ethics committee.Caitlin Brandenburg, Sarah Thorning & Carine Ruthenberg - 2021 - Research Ethics 17 (3):346-358.details One of the key criticisms of the ethical review process is the time taken to decision, and associated resource use. A key source of delay is that most submissions are required to respond to at leas... Download Export citation Bookmark 2 citations
The introduction of research ethics review procedures at a university in South Africa: review outcomes of a social science research ethics committee.Simeon E. H. Davies - 2020 - Research Ethics 16 (1-2):1-26.details The research ethics committee is a key element of university administration and has gained increasing importance as a review mechanism for those institutions that wish to conduct responsible... Download Export citation Bookmark 6 citations

1