Switch to: References

Citations of:

What changes are there in decisions by the Wits Human Research Ethics Committee and in process errors by research applicants between 2003 and 2015? [Book Review]

Peter Cleaton-Jones

South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 9 (2):66-68 (2016)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

The introduction of research ethics review procedures at a university in South Africa: review outcomes of a social science research ethics committee.Simeon E. H. Davies - 2020 - Research Ethics 16 (1-2):1-26.details The research ethics committee is a key element of university administration and has gained increasing importance as a review mechanism for those institutions that wish to conduct responsible... Download Export citation Bookmark 6 citations
What are the most common reasons for return of ethics submissions? An audit of an Australian health service ethics committee.Caitlin Brandenburg, Sarah Thorning & Carine Ruthenberg - 2021 - Research Ethics 17 (3):346-358.details One of the key criticisms of the ethical review process is the time taken to decision, and associated resource use. A key source of delay is that most submissions are required to respond to at leas... Download Export citation Bookmark 2 citations

1