Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Interpreting Aristotle on mixture: Problems about elemental composition from philoponus to Cooper.Michael Weisberg - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):681–706.
    Aristotle’s On generation and corruption raises a vital question: how is mixture, or what we would now call chemical combination, possible? It also offers an outline of a solution to the problem and a set of criteria that a successful solution must meet. Understanding Aristotle’s solution and developing a viable peripatetic theory of chemical combination has been a source of controversy over the last two millennia. We describe seven criteria a peripatetic theory of mixture must satisfy: uniformity, recoverability, potentiality, equilibrium, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Interpreting Aristotle on mixture: problems about elemental composition from Philoponus to Cooper.Rega Wood & Michael Weisberg - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (4):681-706.
    Aristotle’s On generation and corruption raises a vital question: how is mixture, or what we would now call chemical combination, possible? It also offers an outline of a solution to the problem and a set of criteria that a successful solution must meet. Understanding Aristotle’s solution and developing a viable peripatetic theory of chemical combination has been a source of controversy over the last two millennia. We describe seven criteria a peripatetic theory of mixture must satisfy: uniformity, recoverability, potentiality, equilibrium, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Aristotle on the Impossibility of Anaximander’s apeiron: On Generation and Corruption, 332a20-25.Michael Wedin - 2013 - Phronesis 58 (1):17-31.
    In On Generation and Corruption, Aristotle rejects the very possibility of such a thing as Anaximander’s apeiron. Characterized as a kind of intermediate stuff, the apeiron turns out to consist of contraries and as such is impossible. Commentators have rightly noted this point and some have also indicated that Aristotle offers an argument of sorts for his negative estimate. However, the argument has received scant attention, and it is fair to say that it remains unclear exactly why Aristotle rejects Anaximander’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark