Switch to: References

Citations of:

Slouching Towards Vienna: Michael Dummett and the Epistemology of Language

Dissertation, The Ohio State University (1999)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Logical revision re-revisited: On the wright/salerno case for intuitionism. [REVIEW]Jon Cogburn - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (3):231--248.
    In ``Revising the Logic of LogicalRevision'' J. Salerno attempts to undermineCrispin Wright 's recent arguments forintuitionism, and to replace Wright andDummett's arguments with a revisionary argumentof his own. I show that Salerno's criticismsof Wright involve both attributing an inferenceto Wright that no intuitionist would make andfallaciously treating a negative universal asan existential negative. Then I show how verygeneral considerations about the nature ofwarrant undermine both Wright and Salerno'sarguments, when these arguments are applied todiscourses with defeasible warrants. WhileSalerno explicitly restricts his (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The logic of logical revision formalizing Dummett's argument.Jon Cogburn - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):15 – 32.
    Neil Tennant and Joseph Salerno have recently attempted to rigorously formalize Michael Dummett's argument for logical revision. Surprisingly, both conclude that Dummett commits elementary logical errors, and hence fails to offer an argument that is even prima facie valid. After explicating the arguments Salerno and Tennant attribute to Dummett, I show how broader attention to Dummett's writings on the theory of meaning allows one to discern, and formalize, a valid argument for logical revision. Then, after correctly providing a rigorous statement (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation