Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries”.Naomi Scheinerman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):1-3.
    I greatly appreciate the open peer commentary authors’ thoughtful engagement with my proposal to include a Citizens’ Jury (CJ) at the level of the International Commission when exploring ethical re...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens’ Juries.Naomi Scheinerman - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (12):66-76.
    In this paper, I take seriously calls for public engagement in human genome editing decision-making by endorsing the convening of a “Citizens Jury” in conjunction with the International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing’s next summit scheduled for March 6–8, 2023. This institutional modification promises a more inclusive, deliberative, and impactful form of engagement than standard bioethics engagement opportunities, such as comment periods, by serving both normative and political purposes in the quest to offer moral guidance (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations