Switch to: References

Citations of:

Latino identity

Public Affairs Quarterly 13 (3):273-295 (1999)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The categorization of Hispanics in biomedical research: US and Latin American perspectives.Jordan Liz - 2020 - Philosophy Compass 15 (3).
    Contemporary genetic and biomedical research on race and ethnicity has reignited the debate over the biological significance of these categories. This article provides an overview of the critical literature concerning the categorization of Hispanic and Hispanic populations within these research programs. More specifically, this article focuses on issues regarding: The conceptualization of Hispanic identity, issues of data collection and generalization (e.g., the use of a specific Hispanic nationality as a stand‐in for all Hispanics), the tension between social and biological classifications (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Identity confusions.J. L. A. Garcia - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (7):839-862.
    This article responds to logical and social theses proposed by Professor José Medina in discussing the relativity of identity. In exploring the metaphor of family resemblance, the author argues that its causal mechanism is biological, not social; particular features of being a woman, or of belonging to a racial or ethnic group, cannot be reduced to social constructions. The article skeptically discusses the supposed importance of sex, race, and ethnicity to a person’s individual identity, and suggests that moral significance finds (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is being Hispanic an identity? Reflections on J. J. E. Gracia’s account.Jorge Garcia - 2001 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (2):29-43.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Tragic Error and Agent Responsibility.Charlotte Witt - 2005 - Philosophic Exchange 35 (1).
    The characters of tragedy are in some sense responsible for their errors. However, given their ignorance of the consequences of their actions, it seems that they ought not be held responsible by others for what they have done. This is a paradox. The way to resolve the paradox is to distinguish two kinds of agent responsibility: accountability and culpability. Being accountable is primarily a private affair, whereas being culpable entails the possibility of just punishment.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation