Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Argumentos culturales para la responsabilidad social empresarial.Rafael Cejudo Córdoba - 2017 - Recerca.Revista de Pensament I Anàlisi 21:107-130.
    El arte, la literatura o el patrimonio –la Cultura– son afectados de manera específica por la actividad empresarial. Se propone que, más allá del mecenazgo y el patrocinio, la Responsabilidad Cultural Empresarial –rce– abarca las distintas acciones que las empresas realizan para responder a las demandas culturales de sus grupos de interés y a los impactos generados en la Cultura. El artículo aborda la justificación normativa de la rce defendiendo, por una parte, que las empresas pueden alterar la vida cultural (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Born Free and Equal?: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of Discrimination, Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen. Oxford University Press, 2014, 317 pages. [REVIEW]Luara Ferracioli - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (3):486-492.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Human Rights, the Political View, and TNCs: An Exploration.Laura Valentini - 2017 - In Tom Campbell & Kylie Bourne (eds.), Political and Legal Approaches to Human Rights. Routledge. pp. 168-86.
    A recently developed view in political theory holds that only political agents, particularly states, can be primary bearers of human-rights duties. Problematically, this so-called ‘political view’ appears unable to account for the human-rights responsibilities of powerful non-state actors, such as transnational corporations (TNCs). Can a recognizably political view respond to this concern? I show that, once the moral underpinnings of the political view are made explicit, it can. I suggest that, on the political view, what makes states primary bearers of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Democracy in Political Corporate Social Responsibility: A Dynamic, Multilevel Account.Jennifer Goodman & Jukka Mäkinen - 2023 - Business and Society 62 (2):250-284.
    Political corporate social responsibility (PCSR) calls for firms to implement and engage in deliberative democracy processes and structures, addressing governance gaps where governments are unwilling or unable to do so. However, an underlying assumption that the implementation of PCSR will enrich democratic processes in society has been exposed and challenged. In this conceptual article, we explore this challenge by developing a framework to reveal the dynamics of firms’ deliberative democratic processes and structures (meso level), and those at nation state (macro (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Deliberative Democracy and Corporate Constitutionalism: Considering Corporate Constitutional Courts.Sandrine Blanc - 2023 - Journal of Business Ethics 188 (1):1-15.
    Committees multiply in firms, whether stakeholder boards or committees, multi-stakeholder initiatives, ethics committees, or oversight boards. These arrangements aim to organise and legitimise the social and political activities of corporations. This article raises the question of the appropriate form of such governance structures. The examples above illustrate three possible ways of legitimising corporate quasi-public social and political activities: deliberation within the company, deliberation outside, and an approach we label _corporate constitutionalism_. While the first two models have been tested in practice (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Conscientious objection in firms.Sandrine Blanc - 2021 - Economics and Philosophy 37 (2):222-243.
    This article asks whether firms should exempt employees when they object to elements of their work that go against their conscience. Fairness requires that we follow the rules of an organization we have joined voluntarily only if these rules express mutual advantage. In corporations, I argue that subordination and exemption provides for mutual advantage better than subordination plus right of exit. This is because agents want to protect their conscientious convictions, even in hierarchical organizations geared towards efficient preference satisfaction. Thus (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation