Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Retrieving Divine Immensity and Omnipresence.Ross Inman - 2020 - In James M. Arcadi & James T. Turner (eds.), The T&T Clark Handbook of Analytic Theology. New York: T&T Clark/Bloomsbury.
    The divine attributes of immensity and omnipresence have been integral to classical Christian confession regarding the nature of the triune God. Divine immensity and omnipresence are affirmed in doctrinal standards such as the Athanasian Creed (c. 500), the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Council of Basel (1431–49), the Second Helvetic Confession (1566), the Westminster Confession of Faith (1647), the Second London Baptist Confession (1689), and the First Vatican Council (1869–70). In the first section of this chapter, I offer a brief (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Omnipresence and the Location of the Immaterial.Ross Inman - 2010 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    I first offer a broad taxonomy of models of divine omnipresence in the Christian tradition, both past and present. I then examine the recent model proposed by Hud Hudson (2009, 2014) and Alexander Pruss (2013)—ubiquitous entension—and flag a worry with their account that stems from predominant analyses of the concept of ‘material object’. I then attempt to show that ubiquitous entension has a rich Latin medieval precedent in the work of Augusine and Anselm. I argue that the model of omnipresence (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The Word Made Flesh: Dualism, Physicalism, and the Incarnation.Trenton Merricks - 2007 - In Peter Van Inwagen & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Persons: Human and Divine. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 281-301.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • In Defense of Physicalist Christology.Joungbin Lim - 2019 - Sophia 60 (1):193-208.
    Physicalist Christology is the view that God the Son, in the Incarnation, became identical with the body of Jesus. The goal of this paper is to defend PC from two recent objections. One is that if GS is a physical object, then he cannot have properties had by God. Then, by Leibniz’s law, the incarnate GS cannot be identical with the second Person of the Trinity. The other objection is that PC implies that the incarnate GS did not exist in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Pairing Problems: Causal and Christological.Kevin W. Wong - 2021 - Perichoresis 19 (2):99-118.
    Trenton Merricks has objected to dualist conceptions of the Incarnation in a similar way to Jaegwon Kim’s pairing problem. On the original pairing problem, so argues Kim, we lack a pairing relationship between bodies and souls such that body A is causally paired with soul A and not soul B. Merricks, on the other hand, argues that whatever relations dualists propose that do pair bodies and souls together (e.g. causal relations) are relations that God the Son has with all bodies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark