Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rank-into-rank hypotheses and the failure of GCH.Vincenzo Dimonte & Sy-David Friedman - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (3-4):351-366.
    In this paper we are concerned about the ways GCH can fail in relation to rank-into-rank hypotheses, i.e., very large cardinals usually denoted by I3, I2, I1 and I0. The main results are a satisfactory analysis of the way the power function can vary on regular cardinals in the presence of rank-into-rank hypotheses and the consistency under I0 of the existence of j:Vλ+1≺Vλ+1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${j : V_{\lambda+1} {\prec} V_{\lambda+1}}$$\end{document} with the failure of GCH (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • On the relationship between mutual and tight stationarity.William Chen-Mertens & Itay Neeman - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic:102963.
    We construct a model where every increasing ω-sequence of regular cardinals carries a mutually stationary sequence which is not tightly stationary, and show that this property is preserved under a class of Prikry-type forcings. Along the way, we give examples in the Cohen and Prikry models of ω-sequences of regular cardinals for which there is a non-tightly stationary sequence of stationary subsets consisting of cofinality ω_1 ordinals, and show that such stationary sequences are mutually stationary in the presence of interleaved (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal.Spencer Unger - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):483-496.
    From large cardinals we obtain the consistency of the existence of a singular cardinal κ of cofinality ω at which the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis fails, there is a bad scale at κ and κ ++ has the tree property. In particular this model has no special κ +-trees.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The tree property and the failure of SCH at uncountable cofinality.Dima Sinapova - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):553-562.
    Given a regular cardinal λ and λ many supercompact cardinals, we describe a type of forcing such that in the generic extension there is a cardinal κ with cofinality λ, the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis at κ fails, and the tree property holds at κ+.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Diagonal supercompact Radin forcing.Omer Ben-Neria, Chris Lambie-Hanson & Spencer Unger - 2020 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 171 (10):102828.
    Motivated by the goal of constructing a model in which there are no κ-Aronszajn trees for any regular $k>\aleph_1$, we produce a model with many singular cardinals where both the singular cardinals hypothesis and weak square fail.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Good and bad points in scales.Chris Lambie-Hanson - 2014 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (7):749-777.
    We address three questions raised by Cummings and Foreman regarding a model of Gitik and Sharon. We first analyze the PCF-theoretic structure of the Gitik–Sharon model, determining the extent of good and bad scales. We then classify the bad points of the bad scales existing in both the Gitik–Sharon model and other models containing bad scales. Finally, we investigate the ideal of subsets of singular cardinals of countable cofinality carrying good scales.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Aronszajn trees and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis.Itay Neeman - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):139-157.
    The tree property at κ+ states that there are no Aronszajn trees on κ+, or, equivalently, that every κ+ tree has a cofinal branch. For singular strong limit cardinals κ, there is tension between the tree property at κ+ and failure of the singular cardinal hypothesis at κ; the former is typically the result of the presence of strongly compact cardinals in the background, and the latter is impossible above strongly compacts. In this paper, we reconcile the two. We prove (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Diamond, scales and GCH down to $$\aleph _{\omega ^2}$$ ℵ ω 2.Jin Du - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (3):427-442.
    Gitik and Rinot (Trans Am Math Soc 364(4):1771–1795, 2012) proved assuming the existence of a supercompact that it is consistent to have a strong limit cardinal $$\kappa $$ of countable cofinality such that $$2^\kappa =\kappa ^+$$, there is a very good scale at $$\kappa $$, and $$\diamond $$ fails along some reflecting stationary subset of $$\kappa ^+\cap \text {cof}(\omega )$$. In this paper, we force over Gitik and Rinot’s model but with a modification of Gitik–Sharon (Proc Am Math Soc 136(1):311, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Tight stationarity and tree-like scales.William Chen - 2015 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166 (10):1019-1036.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Mathias criterion for the Magidor iteration of Prikry forcings.Omer Ben-Neria - 2023 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 63 (1):119-134.
    We prove a Mathias-type criterion for the Magidor iteration of Prikry forcings.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation