Switch to: References

Citations of:

Justice, age, and veneration

Ethics 108 (4):702-718 (1998)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. They might as well be in bolivia: Race, ethnicity and the problem of solid organ donation.T. Koch - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (6):563-575.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Unequal Right to Age Equality: Towards a Dignified Lives Approach to Age Discrimination.Pnina Alon-Shenker - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 25 (2):243-282.
    This paper critically examines prevailing egalitarian theories (which assess inequality between two individuals on the basis of their lifetime experience). The paper proposes an alternative theoretical framework: theDignified Lives Approach. This theoretical framework, which rests on deontological foundations, considers all human beings as of equal moral worth, and advocates treating each individual with equal concern and respectat any given time. The paper articulates five essential principles of equality founded in the notion of equal concern and respect: the principle ofindividual assessment, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Equality vs. efficiency: The geography of solid organ distribution in the usa.Tom Koch & Ken Denike - 2001 - Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (1):45 – 56.
    There is at present a divide in the geographical literature between those interested in distributive justice as a social value and those who seek to implement distributive plans on the basis of efficiency of resource use. The former are 'social geographers' interested in equity as a social value, and the latter are 'practical' economic and locational geographers. This divide mirrors one existing elsewhere in social science between Rawlsian liberalism and utilitarian planners. Here we argue that equality and efficiency are related (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why Old Things Matter.Simon James - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):313-329.
    It is, I suggest, unclear whether any old inanimate objects deserve to be treated with respect simply because they are old. Yet this does not entail that an object’s age has no bearing at all on the question of how it may permissibly be treated. I defend the claim that those who fail to take seriously the histories of old inanimate objects typically deserve to be criticized on aretaic grounds. Such people, I argue, tend to lack the virtue of humility.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Why Old Things Matter.Simon P. James - 2015 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 12 (3):313-329.
    It is, I suggest, unclear whether any old inanimate objects deserve to be treated with respect simply because they are old. Yet this does not entail that an object’s age has no bearing at all on the question of how it may permissibly be treated. I defend the claim that those who fail to take seriously the histories of old inanimate objects typically deserve to be criticized on aretaic grounds. Such people, I argue, tend to lack the virtue of humility.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Age Discrimination in Layoffs: Factors of Injustice.Eleanor G. Henry & James P. Jennings - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 54 (3):215-221.
    ABSTRACT. This paper considers two sets ethical obligations owed by a firm and its management to stockholders and employees with respect to layoffs. Literature and research from ethics and agency are used to frame ethical issues that pertain to age discrimination in layoffs. An actual court case provides an example for focus, analysis, and discussion. Points of discussion include management''s obligations to employees and factors of injustice related to prejudice against age.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Virtue Ethics, Value-centredness, and Consequentialism.Christine Swanton - 2001 - Utilitas 13 (2):213.
    This paper argues against two major features of consequentialist conceptions of virtue: Value-centredness and the Hegemony of Promotion as a mode of moral acknowledgement or responsiveness. In relation to the first feature, I argue against two ideas: Value should be understood entirely independently of virtue; and The only right-making respects which serve to make an action better than another is degree of value. I argue that what I call the bases of moral response are several, including also status, the good (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation