- Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2017 - Amsterdam: Springer.details
|
|
An arugmentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpertation.Douglas Walton, Giovanni Sartor & Fabrizio Macagno - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (1):51-91.details
|
|
Pragmatic Maxims and Presumptions in Legal Interpretation.Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2018 - Law and Philosophy 37 (1):69-115.details
|
|
Profiles of Dialogue for Relevance.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (4):523-562.details
|
|
‘Cognitive systemic dichotomization’ in public argumentation and controversies.Marcelo Dascal, Amnon Knoll & Daniel Cohen - unknowndetails
|
|
Default semantics and the architecture of the mind.Alessandro Capone - 2011 - Journal of Pragmatics 43:1741–1754..details
|
|
On the tension between semantics and pragmatics.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - RASK: International Journal of Language and Communication 37:5-38.details
|
|
Futher reflections on semantic minimalism: Reply to Wedgwood.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 437-474..details
|
|
Can we say what we mean?: Expressibility and background.Jesús Navarro - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):283-308.details
|
|
Pragmemes revisited. A theoretical framework.Alessandro Capone & Roberto Graci - 2024 - Frontiers in Psychology 31 (15):1-28.details
|
|
Types of dialogue and pragmatic ambiguity.Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi - 2018 - In Sarah Bigi & Fabrizio Macagno (eds.), Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 191-218.details
|
|
An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation.Fabrizio Macagno, Giovanni Sartor & Douglas Walton - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (1):51-91.details
|
|
Understanding misunderstandings. Presuppositions and presumptions in doctor-patient chronic care consultations.Fabrizio Macagno & Sarah Bigi - 2017 - Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (14):49–75.details
|
|
Analizzare l’argomentazione sui social media. Il caso dei tweet di Salvini.Fabrizio Macagno - 2019 - Sistemi Intelligenti 3 (31):601-632.details
|
|
Presuppositions as conversational phenomena.Alessandro Capone - 2017 - Intercultural Pragmatics 198 (198):22-37.details
|
|
Marcelo Dascal and the Dialectics of Epistemological Philosophy.Rodica Amel - 2021 - Philosophy Study 11 (4).details
|
|
How linguistic meaning harmonizes with information through meaning conservation.Prakash Mondal - 2020 - Pragmatics and Cognition 26 (2-3):296-320.details
|
|
Review of Carruthers (2006): The Architecture of the Mind. [REVIEW]Alessandro Capone - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2):468-472.details
|
|
Statutory Interpretation as Argumentation.Douglas Walton, Giovanni Sartor & Fabrizio Macagno - 2011 - In Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.), Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer Verlag. pp. 519-560.details
|
|
Anything New Under the Sun? Legal Clarifications as a Polish New Tool for Interpreting Business Law.Anna Piszcz - 2020 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 33 (3):601-616.details
|
|
Evidence and presumptions for analyzing and detecting misunderstandings.Fabrizio Macagno - 2018 - Pragmatics and Cognition 24 (2):263-296.details
|
|
Assessing relevance.Fabrizio Macagno - 2018 - Lingua 210:42-64.details
|
|
Evasion strategies in international documents: when ‘constructive ambiguity’ leads to oppositional interpretation.Elie Friedman - 2017 - Critical Discourse Studies 14 (4):385-401.details
|
|
Theory-Containment in Controversies: Neurath and Müller on Newton, Goethe, and Underdetermination.Gábor Á Zemplén - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (4):533-549.details
|
|
politeness: Towards an evaluative and embodied approach.Chaoqun Xie - 2008 - Pragmatics and Cognition 16 (1):151-175.details
|
|
Peter A. Cramer: Controversy as News Discourse: Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2011, Viii + 203 pp. [REVIEW]Andrea Rocci & Marta Zampa - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):327-336.details
|
|
Explicatures are NOT Cancellable.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. Cham: Springer. pp. 131-151.details
|
|
What is a convention?Dana Riesenfeld - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2):442-455.details
|
|
politeness Towards an evaluative and embodied approach.Chaoqun Xie - 2008 - Pragmatics and Cognition 16 (1):151-175.details
|
|
Speaker’s meaning and non-cancellability.Guangwu Feng - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):117-138.details
|
|
Sum, quorum, tether: Design principles underlying external representations that promote sustainability.Sanjay Chandrasekharan & Mark Tovey - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (3):447-482.details
|
|
Language is an instrument for thought. Really?Jan Nuyts - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):317-333.details
|
|
Digital Culture: Pragmatic and Philosophical Challenges.Marcelo Dascal - 2006 - Diogenes 53 (3):23 - 39.details
|
|