- Futher reflections on semantic minimalism: Reply to Wedgwood.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy. Cham: Springer. pp. 437-474..details
|
|
(1 other version)The ontology of conflict.Sara Greco Morasso - 2008 - Pragmatics and Cognition 16 (3):540-567.details
|
|
Locke and Leibniz on the Balance of Reasons.Markku Roinila - 2013 - In Dana Riesenfeld & Giovanni Scarafile (eds.), Perspectives on Theory of Controversies and the Ethics of Communication: Explorations of Marcelo Dascal's Contributions to Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 49-57.details
|
|
Etapas/ Fases de la argumentación.María G. Navarro - 2011 - In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos Gómez (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. [Madrid]: Editorial Trotta. pp. 243--244.details
|
|
Marcelo Dascal’s Theory of Controversies.Aviram Sariel - 2016 - Latest Issue of Pragmatics Cognition 23 (3):437-460.details
|
|
(1 other version)Controversies on Body.Giovanni Scarafile - 2016 - Pragmatics and Cognition 23 (3):486-499.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Review of Eemeren & Garssen (2008): Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Inês Signorini - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (1):181-187.details
|
|
(1 other version)Multivoiced decisions: A study of migrants’ inner dialogue and its connection to social argumentation.Sara Greco Morasso - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (1):55-80.details
|
|
The rationality of legal argumentation.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):383-401.details
|
|
(1 other version)Terror and the Leviathan.Y. M. Barilan - 2016 - Pragmatics and Cognition 23 (3):461-471.details
|
|
Argumentation and learning.Baruch B. Schwarz - 2009 - In Nathalie Muller Mirza & Anne Nelly Perret-Clermont (eds.), Argumentation and education. New York: Springer. pp. 91--126.details
|
|