Switch to: References

Citations of:

Procrustean solutions to animal identity and welfare problems

In John Sanbonmatsu (ed.), Critical Theory and Animal Liberation. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 35--54 (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Biotechnology as End Game: Ontological and Ethical Collapse in the “Biotech Century”.Zipporah Weisberg - 2015 - NanoEthics 9 (1):39-54.
    I argue in this paper that animal biotechnology constitutes a dangerous ontological collapse between animals and the technical-economic apparatus. By ontological collapse, I mean the elimination of fundamental ontological tensions between embodied subjects and the principles of scientific, technological, and economic rationalization. Biotechnology imposes this collapse in various ways: by genetically “reprogramming” animals to serve as uniform commodities, by abstracting them into data and code, and, in some cases, by literally manipulating their movements with computer technologies. These and other forms (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Eating Insects: A Christian Ethic of Farmed Insect Life.Jack Slater - 2022 - Studies in Christian Ethics 35 (1):155-171.
    Proponents of entomophagy have argued that the farming of insects offers many advantages when contrasted with more traditional farming practices. This article explores the place of insect farming within a wider Christian food ethic and argues that insect farming has much to recommend it. However, through exploring the role of animal agriculture within the ideological structures of anthropocentrism, a more ambiguous picture of the ethics of insect farming emerges. This belies a simple endorsement or denunciation of insect farming as an (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why is a live chicken banned from the kindergarten? Two lessons learned from teaching posthuman pedagogy to university students.Marleena Mustola - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1434-1443.
    The hierarchical human-centric paradigm has been criticized by various movements of posthuman philosophy because this paradigm forgets and dismisses nonhuman beings and entities: animals, n...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Animal Disenhancement for Animal Welfare: The Apparent Philosophical Conundrums and the Real Exploitation of Animals. A Response to Thompson and Palmer. [REVIEW]Arianna Ferrari - 2012 - NanoEthics 6 (1):65-76.
    Abstract In his paper “The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken problem” ( Nanoethics 2: 305-36, 2008) Thompson argued that technological attempts to reduce or eliminate selected non-human animals’ capabilities (animal disenhancements) in order to solve or mitigate animal welfare problems in animals’ use pose a philosophical conundrum, because there is a contradiction between rational arguments in favor of these technological interventions and intuitions against them. In her response “Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations