Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Mill's Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character*: Roderick T. Long.Roderick T. Long - 1992 - Utilitas 4 (2):279-297.
    J. S. Mill's distinction between higher and lower pleasures is often thought to conflict with his commitment to psychological and ethical hedonism: if the superiority of higher pleasures is quantitative, then the higher/lower distinction is superfluous and Mill contradicts himself; if the superiority of higher pleasures is not quantitative, then Mill's hedonism is compromised.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Some are base, some are sublime: A defence of hedonistic utilitarianism. [REVIEW]S. C. Patten - 1980 - Journal of Value Inquiry 14 (3-4):275-286.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The happiness criterion.Stanley Malinovich - 1972 - Philosophia 2 (3):195-203.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Psychology behind J. S. Mill's 'Proof'.G. W. Spence - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (163):18 - 28.
    Professor J. B. Schneewind's recent excellent volume Mill's Ethical Writings has drawn attention to the necessity of studying Mill's notes to chapter XXIII of his father's Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind for a clear understanding of his theory of the moral sentiments. There are notes, however, by J. S. Mill to other chapters of that work, which should not be forgotten, because they elucidate the associationist theory of motivation which is obscurely appealed to in chapter IV of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Utility of Quality: An Understanding of Mill.Richard N. Bronaugh - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):317 - 325.
    Henry Sidgwick remarked in The Methods of Ethics regarding pleasure that the “distinctions of quality that Mill and others urge may … be admitted as grounds of preference, but only in so far as they can be resolved into distinctions of quantity.” Sidgwick had not believed that Mill intended that resolution and commented in his history that “it is hard to see in what sense a man who of two alternative pleasures chooses the less pleasant on the ground of its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark